rohit2412

12 ms·

61.
by rohit2412 7y ago
I guess then net worth should be seen as savings
62.
by rohit2412 7y ago
First, tesla is not profitable. Second, would you consider that the hype, the lies, the cult, and the overly optimistic statements might be a reason that Tesla can sell so many cars? Could Ford pull this off?
63.
by rohit2412 7y ago
Or cloth bags. Seriously, they are stronger, hold more stuff and hurt less because of sharp edges. All you need to do is just carry them
64.
by rohit2412 7y ago
I am not arguing for open borders though. That is a separate argument. You can definitely limit immigration, and do it fairly.
65.
by rohit2412 7y ago
Of course it is discrimination. A British born person has better chances at PR than an Indian born person. The Indian is being given less opportunities not because of their skills or talent, but because of their place of birth. > The lim
66.
by rohit2412 7y ago
Discrimination based on place of birth isn't a concern? Would you have the same response if there was a similar rule to limit immigration for Muslims, or homosexuals?
67.
by rohit2412 7y ago
What exactly is your point? You do understand that they have made it tougher to buy 35k$ model 3 only because they can't make profit off it? According to Tesla they have the cheapest batteries, the best AI chips, the most automated fa
68.
by rohit2412 7y ago
This is the Crux of the problem. Elon musk and Tesla are happy to use words with misleading meaning deliberately. Autopilot, full self driving, "solved", safer than a human driver etc.
69.
by rohit2412 7y ago
https://www.intego.com/mac-security-blog/iphone-20-and-ipod-... The first iPod touch had a broadcom chip that supported Bluetooth, but wasn't supported in the software stack. You needed to upgrade to use the Bluet
70.
by rohit2412 7y ago
> often had hardware features locked out by software so that you could pay extra to unlock them. Funny, apple did this to iPod touch
71.
by rohit2412 7y ago
They lied about being the best in the world about their chips. Nvidia posted about them. They lie about autopilot and fsd being driverless, while they are irresponsibly deployed driver assistance technologies. Their whole argument for feasi
72.
by rohit2412 7y ago
> A biometric ID is as obviously a lynchpin of a surveillance state as the necessity of a unique key to run a database. That's disingenuous. A government is also a lynchpin for a surveillance state, so you'll support anarchy? A
73.
by rohit2412 7y ago
> Do you think self driving cars should be prohibited as long as they are less safe than the standard set by human+collision avoidance cars? If having a human in the car reduces the accident rate, then I propose making it necessary for t
74.
by rohit2412 7y ago
That's a fair argument to hold, that's why I limited the robot to only intervene when accident is imminent.
75.
by rohit2412 7y ago
> if self-driving cars are statistically safer than humans, then allowing humans to drive will make cars less safe again. You mean "if driverless cars are statistically safer than humans". It shouldn't be a surprise that
76.
by rohit2412 7y ago
People buying current cars were just told that their cars will earn them 30k$ a year. Is fsd driver assistance or driverless?
77.
by rohit2412 7y ago
So call them driver assists. I am tired of seeing driver assists being sold as driverless systems.
78.
by rohit2412 7y ago
I'm getting tired of saying this. Why is it one or the other? Why only a human driver or a robot driver? Could you have a human driver in charge with an accident preventing robot, getting the best of both worlds? If the human falls asl
79.
by rohit2412 7y ago
How does that measurement occur? Since all particles interact via gravitational and electromagnetic Force all the time, why aren't they always entangled. I never see a definition of measurement, or observation.
80.
by rohit2412 7y ago
I think a lot of hidden variables theories have been discredited. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/374266/what-are-...
81.
by rohit2412 7y ago
And I never understand what is a "measurement". Has it something to do with a human being observing it? Isn't any measurement just electromagnetic or gravitation forces acting on it, which act all the time?
82.
by rohit2412 7y ago
Maybe because atheists like me are beheaded in certain countries. Why would you shut down criticism of the ideology that does that?
83.
by rohit2412 7y ago
It might help a Muslim leave his religion. A religion which ostracizes atheist so much that they are still killed by stoning and decapitation. It might appeal to non Christians, ex-hindus like me. Or ex-Christians. Should you be part of a g
84.
by rohit2412 8y ago
Yes, not only the western countries dump it in developing countries, they get money for it.
85.
by rohit2412 8y ago
Wait what? Could you expand on that? That seems to be very stupid "mistake" from some very important economists.
86.
by rohit2412 8y ago
> Could you explain this more? All data I have seen shows Autopilot is much safer than a human driver. This is why I get annoyed when somebody argues that Tesla doesn't do false marketing. Why would this guy think that autopilot is
87.
by rohit2412 8y ago
If the person who owns it is the government, then it belongs to the public.
88.
by rohit2412 8y ago
I think that assumption makes sense if you don't think of the system as a closed loop. What if the increase in GDP happened only because you borrowed money and spent it? What if you don't spend an equivalent amount next year, and
89.
by rohit2412 8y ago
https://www.electrifyamerica.com/locate-charger Some of them are for charging at 350KW, current Tesla Supercharger's top out at 150KW, and the next gen targets 250KW..
90.
by rohit2412 8y ago
> There's only 119 supercharging stations in the US That seems too little for 1400 worldwide. This image says 447 in USA. https://www.theatlas.com/charts/BJak7NcSz Any source for 119?

More ›