roenxi

41 ms·

781.
by roenxi 1y ago
You can also talk to someone as a service, if you ever feel that is the weak link in your lifestyle.
782.
by roenxi 1y ago
At doing what, though? Why are they solving the SAT problem?
783.
by roenxi 1y ago
I've always been fascinated by how linear programming seems to be applicable to every problem under the sun but SAT solvers only really seem to be good at Sudoku. In practice that are a bunch of problems that seem to be SAT, but they a
784.
by roenxi 1y ago
I personally agree with the PSF that the risk of weird political things happening is too high to risk taking the money under any circumstances. And I have no objection at all if they want to have whoever at PyCon. But there is a double-pers
785.
by roenxi 1y ago
If we're talking broader "sides" the mistaken one does look pretty bad. Fantasising doom based on facts someone doesn't understand while having those facts clarified is a bad look. It'd be like me going through a
786.
by roenxi 1y ago
I'd love to know how they got to 5/3. It also offers CPM to half-life conversion which has to be at least poorly labelled. That would imply that if two piles of different radioactive substances emit the same amount of radiation (o
787.
by roenxi 1y ago
The report doesn't read like something involving 500 rem and potential death in 3 weeks. It says "Non Emergency". Can you link to this converter? It seems to be a rather key step that got handwaved. Wiki says [0] there isn&#x
788.
by roenxi 1y ago
It does say that. Can you translate that into a measurement of radioactivity & medical risk? I don't think it is obvious. EDIT The report below it seems to literally be "nothing interesting happened". The thresholds her
789.
by roenxi 1y ago
The pool. But it isn't necessarily a problem - your hair, right now, is radioactive. Presumably wouldn't trip a measuring device because it'd be background levels. The linked report doesn't say how radioactive his hair i
790.
by roenxi 1y ago
It seems possible that most CTOs are in tiny startups, don't have reports and we don't know about them because, having no reports, they don't get a lot of visibility compared to someone at the top of a 10,000 person org chart
791.
by roenxi 1y ago
Their free tier is strictly inferior to Google's though, Gmail is 15GB storage free, proton is 15GB paid. Coincidentally that is the difference between me being able to use the service for free and not.
792.
by roenxi 1y ago
> (A great writer is more authoritative than rando vibes.) A great author is equivalent to rando vibes when it comes to what writing looks like, they aren't typesetting experts. I have a shelf of work by great authors (more than one
793.
by roenxi 1y ago
Great writers aren't experts in the look of punctuation, I don't think anyone makes a point of you have to read Dickinson in the original font that she wrote in. Some of the greats hand-wrote their work in script that may as well
794.
by roenxi 1y ago
You might find some inspiration in this video of metronomes synchronising and desynchronysing [0]. It doesn't take much to cause things to happen at the same time, in the case the CEOs are likely all responding to the same market signa
795.
by roenxi 1y ago
The deal is the journalists (propagandists) get to be in the building if they're compliant with whatever narrative the US government wants to be spread. The US government is changing the narrative they want to target, implementing that
796.
by roenxi 1y ago
> Except that the government’s agenda is by and large the agenda of the people that it represents. In this case the government's agenda is that these journalists should either get Hegseth to stamp their articles or pack their cardbo
797.
by roenxi 1y ago
It is a safe starting point that my comments are my opinion. If I'm presenting a fact or someone else's opinion I usually hyperlink it with square brackets. > Then why are they not paid by the government? They're not gover
798.
by roenxi 1y ago
The idea that these journalists suddenly found a spine is also dumb [0]. It was an example about as far on the other end of the spectrum from what jacquesm said as I could think of; obviously it is dumb too. It's an extreme example. Th
799.
by roenxi 1y ago
Why bother? It hasn't caused a major problem so far. This isn't new, it is how the world has worked for all of military history. I know classified US secrets, the leaks around the Snowden era were pretty interesting. Guarantee you
800.
by roenxi 1y ago
Yeah. I don't know if you've ever played at office politics but information that isn't supposed to get around gets around like mad once people are in the same room for any length of time. There is no way they aren't find
801.
by roenxi 1y ago
The reason they were in the building in the first place was to give the US government control over the narrative. We're moving from a state where the government was trying to control the narrative to the same state. That is what makes
802.
by roenxi 1y ago
If you want me to try explaining something more clearly you should include a rough outline of what you think I said. Otherwise I've basically got nothing to do but repeat myself. Hopefully this helps. The journalists and the generals c
803.
by roenxi 1y ago
Well... maybe. If a company brings in new anti-sexual-assault training and a bunch of people quit around the same time that doesn't necessarily suggest the problem is the outrageous training. I'd quite like to actually see what th
804.
by roenxi 1y ago
Did you know the Netherlands, back in 2019, scored [0] the highest wealth inequality globally according to Wiki? Just saying. It does look like a bit of a fluke but I found that hilarious. Although the wiki article actually specifically cit
805.
by roenxi 1y ago
Not exactly. The general centralisation trend is a result of relative forces. The EU's suitability for a software ecosystem might be relative or absolute. It is like if one country bans encryption and another doesn't. Any company
806.
by roenxi 1y ago
Imagine one actor in the tech space charges $/whatever which is slightly cheaper than the next nearest rival. Everyone flocks to that company and they become fabulously wealthy. Because of that effect the market tends to centralise. An
807.
by roenxi 1y ago
At this level it really is a case of purpose-of-the-system-is-what-it-does. The EU is clearly not interested in building up a tech sector. Factions in the EU, yes. EU as a block, no. They've shown less than no interest; the EU would be
808.
by roenxi 1y ago
Graphics cards haven't ever done graphics. Graphics is a screen thing. Nobody looks at their graphics card to see little pictures. So they are still misnamed, but they've always been misnamed. They do BLAS.
809.
by roenxi 1y ago
There also seems to be a misconception about what failing an audit means. If you have an organisation spending an ungodly amount of money in ways it can't track ... you would expect all the services for its own members to be gold plate
810.
by roenxi 1y ago
> However, the hardware situation you described sounds very brittle to me. If the machine shop is so tightly constrained and error-phobic, that sounds like there's very little space of tinkering, exploration or innovation. The techn

More ›