Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
roenxi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
55 ms
·
661.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
I can see why they'd struggle, I'm not sure what you're trying to ask the model to do. What type of analysis are you expecting? If the model is supposed to represent the views expressed that would be a summary. If you aren&#x
662.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
We do have AI systems that write stories [0]. They work. The quality might not be spectacular but if you've ever gone out and spent time reading fanfiction you'd have to agree there are a lot of rather terrible human writers too (
663.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
As far as I can tell from poking people on HN about what "AGI" means, there might be a general belief that the median human is not intelligent. Given that the current batch of models apparently isn't AGI I'm struggling t
664.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
I agree that the China experiment hasn't empirically disproven IP law for the reasons you go in it. And this thread has hit the usual problem that "IP laws" are very broad and cover everything from basic common sense around t
665.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
> I hate to be that guy I think it is more ClickHouse Marketing being that guy; they have a vaguely aggressive feel to them and slightly-questionable claims like that seem on-vibe to me. Although it is tolerable. Selling databases is har
666.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
(1) It seems unlikely that the Russians would care about Ukraine having a Jewish president. Wikipedia suggests the Nazis killed around 3 Russians for every 2 Jews who died in the Holocaust and the Nazis never got to fully implement the plan
667.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
If we're hypothesising a perfect world, ideally they standardise some way of sharing framebuffers between programs into Wayland. I suppose maybe they already have I gave up on the ecosystem in the early 2020s. That seems like it should
668.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
Hard to say, but probably not. Obviously limiting the model's access to history doesn't matter, because it is a given that models have gaps in their knowledge there. Most of history never got written down, so any given model won&#
669.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
Yeah, but geopolitics is a chaotic system and the US foreign policy has failed at pretty much everything for decades now - these are the people who managed to cement Taliban control of Afghanistan and appear to be losing the economic race o
670.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
> I am really struggling to understand how so many human brains routinely confuse such different things as a cultural artifact (like a language) with a violent act (a military invasion). The human brain is a hyperactive pattern recogniti
671.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
Unfortunately it is a bit more subtle than that though: (1) Questions reveal a lot about someone's state of mind, particularly if there are a lot of them. If someone is actually struggling and doesn't maintain a vague silence, the
672.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
> Why on earth is a government-protected monopoly entitled to 10% margins? Indeed, how do they pick any margin? If higher is better, why not pick 1000%? If lower is better, why not pick 0%? If we want something reasonable, why not make i
673.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octree
674.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
That'd be a massive break from tradition in the US. AFAIK the only formal mechanism they have to separate the official from the person behind the role is impeachment by Congress. Apart from that there isn't really a mechanism to h
675.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
> all men being subject to the law was pretty explicit purpose of the founding of america. I mean, they had a whole revolution about it. I don't think it is a feasible claim. Revolutionaries, by definition it seems to me, believe so
676.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
One-off incidents don't really mean anything in the big picture. However, I do recall back when there were grid problems in Texas a few years ago someone justifying the high prices California paid as due to their high grid reliability
677.
▲
by
roenxi
10mo ago
The NASDAQ line go up model is why the AI boom is happening and a major factor in why it is Western companies leading the charge. The more bigger issue is that the west refused to sell chips to China so they had to figure out how to make th
678.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
> Anything that makes owning an empty building a bad investment in all circumstances But empty buildings aren't a bad idea under all circumstances. Eg, It might be prudent to have empty living space in a tourist or student area to d
679.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
Logically that is setting up an argument where no matter what the CEO says you're going to assume they're going to take an action. If they say yea, obviously it is a yes. If they say nay, it means they're thinking about it wh
680.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
Yeah, the article's quoting didn't help its case. It doesn't seem fair to quote someone saying [I don't think X is a good idea] as evidence they are about to do X. That being said, in the original context [0] it does sou
681.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
> They maintain a codebase that rivals that of Chrome and of the Linux Kernel and push the equivalent of Rust's entire codebase on a monthly basis. Is that comparison supposed to make their management of the code base seem better or
682.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
That isn't really the best way to think about not-for-profit schemes like Mozilla. Every organisation eventually becomes corrupted (as in fact we see with Mozilla), so creating an eternal pot of money for something is not strategically
683.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
> The median though is getting crushed if they went to college and are paying for daycare. > If you are getting crushed for going to school and having children that is a pretty clear breakdown of the social contract. That isn't a
684.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
I don't know why you think that graph is contradicting me, if wages and productivity aren't linked having people do make-work is even more stupid! They're already doing work that they aren't even being compensated for, f
685.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
Yeah it'd be a wild view to call him among the most popular. But he is actually [0] pretty standard for a modern president - probably the least popular [1] but he doesn't stand out that much among the Bush/Biden/Obama po
686.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
No, what I'm saying is that around 6-8 out of 10 people are worse at empathy than a chatbot, in my estimation. And even if that gets knocked down a little I still don't see how people would argue that humans have some unassailable
687.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
> You realize the dark figure of men getting abused by their wives is higher then the media reports? In any case, my point is, violence in relationships happens both ways. Yes. That is in fact pretty much exactly what I'm arguing. P
688.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
Sure, I assume some sociopaths would have extremely high levels of cognitive empathy. It is really a question of semantics - but the issue is I don't think the people arguing against AGI can define their terms at all without the curren
689.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
Do you not talk to ordinary people? They are not intelligent conversationalists. They tend to be more of the "lol" variety.
690.
▲
by
roenxi
11mo ago
The stats are something like 1 in 10 people experience domestic violence. Unless someone takes a vow of silence and goes to live in the wilderness there is no way to avoid awful people. They're just people. The average standard is not
More ›