rockemsockem

9 ms·

91.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
If enough people internal at Google get pissed off and raise this up enough it can legitimately get rolled back.
92.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
I feel like you're trying to misunderstand. Let's review the easy to parse things that have been said > I suppose you could say the same thing of Germany in the 1930s. The parallels aren’t even that hard to find as there are li
93.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
You're borderline saying "the present US administration, elected democratically, is equivalent to the Nazis". That's insane. We used to have a rule on the Internet for people like you. I'm no Trump fan, and people m
94.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
No he can't because the US is paying for that, it is the government's mission. And fwiw now the gray area of free starlink in Ukraine also taken care of, the US government is handling that contracting like they do with all weapons
95.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
If you want to work on manned spaceflight specifically or Mars colonization even more specifically, where exactly could you better spend your time?
96.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
[flagged]
97.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
The space shuttle was an awesome feat of engineering, but in practical terms, it cost a lot for every launch, so it really didn't deliver well on the most important piece of what reusability is supposed to get you. The tiles themselves
98.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
I believe it's because the space of physics interacting with specific designs of specific components in the context of a large system with other specific components is very, very big and thus it is not feasible to just "simulate e
99.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Why?
100.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Your comment does what your comment says isn't okay. Maybe you shouldn't go around policing people's opinions.
101.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
> This current iteration of Apple lacks the geniuses and visionaries that might have possibly justified their behavior at some point in the past, so you have a soulless corporate churn reinforcing the biggest walled garden in the history
102.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
For hardware only
103.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
I am searching for the incredible information and I can't find it without the LLM because I don't know the proper terminology ahead of time and search isn't that good unless you know exactly what you want.
104.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Yep, 100%. It just feels worse with doctors imo because it feels like the culture treats them like some monolith of skill and wisdom.
105.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Okay that at least makes sense to me. IMO it's also clearly wrong, because I think even if you believe most of AI is hype you must see the value that a lot of people are getting from it, like the housing market example I gave. Apprecia
106.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
So you think the entire perceived value of AI will be wiped out. I think we probably are in a bubble, but much like housing bubbles in major metro areas, the value is real and so the bubble is on top of that real value vs being 100% synthet
107.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
That's a good point and even worse we'll eventually end up with yet another issue where both left and right offer terrible options and there's no nuanced middle ground :/
108.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
I don't totally follow what you're saying. Are you saying that LLMs are most useful if you're not intellectually curious, and therefore most interested in immediate answers, but also that they're very useful if you'
109.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Verification is often easier/faster than coming up with the answer totally
110.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Absolutely not. A horse and carriage will do fine thank you very much.
111.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
I feel like you're coming from a very strange place of both using advanced technology that saves you time and expands your personal knowledge base and at the same time saying that the more advanced technology that saves you even more t
112.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Did you miss the part where I said it helps me find new knowledge that I wouldn't have otherwise? That is pretty significant in my book.
113.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
For me it's pretty much all knowledge that I'm immediately operationalizing. I occasionally use it to look up actors and stuff too, but most of the time it's information that provides direct value to me
114.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Have you even tried using them though? Like in earnest? Or do you see yourself as a conscientious objector of sorts?
115.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Coziness with banks can certainly be an issue, I don't know specifics and that article is pay walled for me, but it sounds very believable to me. That doesn't really change what I said regarding interest rates though.
116.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Because the middleman is faster and practically never lies/hallucinates for simple queries, the middleman can handle vague queries that Google and Wikipedia cannot. The same reasons you use Wikipedia instead of reading all the citation
117.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
Citing AI for layoffs is great cover for "we over hired during Covid". There probably are a few nuts out there that actually fired people to be replaced with AI, I feel like that won't go well for them There really is no evid
118.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
What is this AI slop that you're wading through and where is it? Spam emails are not any worse for being verbose, I don't recognize the sender, I send it straight to spam. The volume seems to be the same. You don't want an AI
119.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
See my previous statement > Once you have several fundamental terms and phrases for new topics it's easy to then validate the information with some quick googling too. You're practically saying that looking at an index in the b
120.
by rockemsockem 1y ago
And here I thought the right liked boobs, smh

More ›