Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
robryk
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
241.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
3D printing stuff that's foodsafe is nontrivial. You not only need a material that is not directly harmful (in temperatures it will be used in), but also most 3d printed surfaces will not be smooth. This makes them very hard to properl
242.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Fair point. He says that the 20% estimate is unlikely to be revised upward, but it's "unlikely because you can't get more than 30% using reasonable approaches to PV" and not "unlikely because you can't get more
243.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Note that some of the statements there (e.g. estimates of areas needed to provide power from solar energy) are not technology-dependent (ie. are about physical limitations).
244.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
> Over the last decade Solar has become price competitive sans subsidies (...) // I haven't watched the video. Would love to see a text version thereof if it exists. Is it per unit of power that can be produced under optim
245.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Ah, I see where the disagreement lies. I've thought that by downsides you mean _relative_ downsides, whereas you meant absolute ones. Thanks for the detailed explanation of your position.
246.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
> I didn't say I thought key based logins were bad, but that not allowing a password login during setup made it more awkward for people trying out CoreOS to test. Especially if it's awkward, it's good to force this immedia
247.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
I do not have an opinion on whether CoreOS is geared towards large deployments. However, I very strongly disagree with the example you give. Every person who does Ops work has an SSH key. Creating one and keeping it on your laptop/desk
248.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Don't do this on your domain. Have a separate domain for user content (and, if the content isn't public, better have many separate domains and distribute the content between them; maybe even have a per-user domain). Browsers can b
249.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Voice in one direction and voice and graphics in the other?
250.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
I find it weird that all the standards in the privacy space (that I know about) seem to me to be much more about checkbox-checking compliance (ie. following their letter doesn't help much or at all) as opposed to standards in reliabili
251.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
My family has a furnace for heating water and the house. The furnace has a control unit that controls the burner and pumps. There is also a "manual operation" switch, to be used if the control unit fails, that simply switches ever
252.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Why do you create an env variable that contains the whole file in question when the editor returned success? Wouldn't something like: cat "$f"; rm "$f" not involve loading the whole file in memory at once? No
253.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
There are other methods to prevent such occurrences: furnaces have "flame out of bounds" sensors and/or chimney flow sensors: this is very good at preventing the furnace from starting a fire of its own. If there's alread
254.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
I find such a comment to contribute more to the discussion (if it's actually discussed) than all the anecdotes from many of the other top-level comments. They are nicely worded and afford many points that can be discussed, most of them
255.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
What kind of incident could safety regulations be trying to prevent by forbidding a furnace from operating when remote control is unreachable?
256.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Is this really the semantics "backup plan" has for many people? For me it's something that's very inferior to the, well, plan.
257.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Also, this is one of the cases where you can probably free up some memory bandwidth by transferring compressed samples around.
258.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
The interface is slightly weird. If I call Sub() twice (e.g. in two different goroutines) for the same queue, each message will be received by one of these two subscribers (because the channel is shared). I'd expect exact opposite: all
259.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
So what do you propose as a guiding principle in place of utilitarianism?
260.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
The same site has a complete set of manuals for a WW2 era US submarine: http://maritime.org/doc/index.htm#ss
261.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Indeed I didn't consider that. Thanks a lot for being patient and enlightening.
262.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
It's because of strain while vomiting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boerhaave_syndrome
263.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Note that this is a very indirect way of harming someone: eating peppers has (likely) caused vomiting, violent vomiting has caused rupture of the esophagus. This is similar to saying that walking can cause fat embolism (a life threatening c
264.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
The way I read your argument, it relies on denying access to be cheaper or simpler than spoofing (X == spoofing, Y == denying access to authoritative NS): You are arguing that a kind of attacks is made more dangerous, because in the world w
265.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Right now, to keep a poisoned entry one must keep poisoning the cache. In that world, one can still do that. One can also poison the entry once and then deny access to the real server . You seem to be arguing that this is easier than conti
266.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
All the attacks mentioned here seem to be of the following shape: 1. Let's somehow get a record that points at a host controlled by us into many resolvers (by compromising a host or by actually inserting a record). 2. Let's prolon
267.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Attacker's first attempt has a nonnegligible chance of success. Attacker can just do one attempt against one account and move to attacking a different account after each failure.
268.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
I wonder if cards are transparent enough in some wavelength, in which the markings on the face are still readable.
269.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
> But if the dealer was known he would have to reimburse me, no? Yes, but even if you've caused a judgement against him to be passed there'd likely be nothing to collect from (because you're not the only person in such a s
270.
▲
by
robryk
10y ago
Dealing with stolen goods is something that's specially handled by the law (e.g. fencing is a separate crime). All these are situations where due to actions of person A a situation has occurred where either person B or person C must be
More ›