robryk

13 ms·

91.
by robryk 4y ago
If you require client certificates then you don't need to worry about non-insider attacks on anything other than your TLS library and your client cert bootstrap procedure.
92.
by robryk 4y ago
We lost common access to the means that were used to communicate earlier. For example, anonymous and unrevocable access to the phone network used to exist in the form of payphones, which are being phased out.
93.
by robryk 4y ago
I agree with the latter part, but for the former note that Earth's surface is 2d: you can go around holdouts; unlike roads you don't care about the fiber being straight.
94.
by robryk 4y ago
If all your endpoints are at least somewhat under your control (i.e. the thing doesn't need to be accessible via a web browser on a vanilla computer) you can reduce "exploits" to "exploits of my implementation of TLS&#x2
95.
by robryk 4y ago
Thanks, the papers you quoted seem to describe something with low losses (though i can't find explicit statements to that effect when skimming). I was under the impression that nonlinear optics will have huge losses, because it require
96.
by robryk 4y ago
What do you mean by "passes"? Unless it's a file on a removable medium or a remote fs, it has to be created, which requires opening it. Scanning removable media upon insertion and remote fses upon mounting is going to look mi
97.
by robryk 4y ago
Life expectancy is computed as if the model person lived all their life years this year. This means that when e.g. a new communicable disease appears which is more risky the first time one falls ill, its effect on life expectancy is outsize
98.
by robryk 4y ago
If they actually wanted to offer up control to the pubic in some way, how would they go about that? I guess they could create an appeals process for their decisions that's independent of them; or do you have something else in mind?
99.
by robryk 4y ago
I really mean my original question. I think what CF is doing is trying to behave like a utility, and i think it's arguably in their best interest[1]. You seem to think that it's very obviously not in their interest. Care to elabor
100.
by robryk 4y ago
What incentives do you claim they are under? I'm sorry, but you seem to be assuming some context i seem not to have.
101.
by robryk 4y ago
I'm sorry, i don't see how this answers my question. What do you mean by "this symptom"?
102.
by robryk 4y ago
What change would that be? I don't know of anything they could do to make themselves a utility besides behaving like one and publicly starting that they intend to do so.
103.
by robryk 4y ago
The problem with them is that you don't get multiple layers of nonlinear operations: wave functions in simple media form a linear space after all.
104.
by robryk 4y ago
The GP is plainly wrong. ~Everyone in Switzerland does normal vehicular left turns, and the bicycle exam for schoolchildren includes making vehicular left turns correctly (i.e. signaling, waiting for cars that are in process of overtaking y
105.
by robryk 4y ago
Yes (in the field of CS, in other fields it might vary). That said, for me the most important difference was a thing around expectations: I felt fine to spend all the time I wished on the thing that became my thesis, to the exclusion of eve
106.
by robryk 4y ago
> (...) the projects are often like (...) This seems to suggest that asking a candidate with an MSc about their thesis might be useful
107.
by robryk 4y ago
I'm surprised by that. I would expect low enough exposure to cause abnormally low bone density and other calcium-related problems via "vitamin"[1] D deficiency. [1] It's not really a vitamin, because we do produce it int
108.
by robryk 4y ago
Do you know why the two plastics are different? I would naively expect that everything that would work as the inner layer in tetrapak would also work in cans (cans deform less). Is it that making the layer stick to tetrapak is simpler/
109.
by robryk 5y ago
> Forged art, like counterfeit money, is illegal to own or sell. Do you have a reference for that? At least in Poland that's explicitly not the case, and I'm curious how does that kind of legislation distinguish between a forge
110.
by robryk 5y ago
This works in everything that uses libreadline to accept user input (unless the binary has specifically configured library differently iiuc), so should work in all shell-like interfaces. You can customize the shortcuts in inputrc, likewise,
111.
by robryk 5y ago
Do I understand correctly that this assumes that there's only one wireguard peer?
112.
by robryk 5y ago
The attack you're describing doesn't require wifi. If the victim visits the attacker's page, the attacker page is free to request signatures (also non-presence-attesting signatures) from the key. This can be used to send data
113.
by robryk 5y ago
First, reactor protection systems will start reducing power down to 40% nominal if the turbogenerator load disappears (search for URB in https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/... ). The p
114.
by robryk 5y ago
The dictionary that dict.cc uses knows that versioning is a word, and has translations of it into other languages. I don't know what dictionary it is, nor if it contains definitions too.
115.
by robryk 5y ago
Right now signal's infrastructure could figure out (if it stored data that everyone claims it doesn't) which IP address is sending messages to which IP address. If stories end up being implemented as a group conversation with all
116.
by robryk 5y ago
Also, can we get a laser that's collimated badly enough that the beam is ~harmless at distances where an aircraft can be, while still collimated well enough to fry the insect? (In the spirit of "the best radiation shield is r squa
117.
by robryk 5y ago
What you could do is use Tup's LUA support (you can write tupfiles and tuprules in LUA, and you can define and use LUA functions in them): have each rule handle just one step of your process, generate the whole necessary DAG of rules,
118.
by robryk 5y ago
How does !macro rid you of that portability issue? One way or another, you'd need to have a command that does that whole sequence of operations. If it's inline, I'd expect same portability problem (`&&` in Bash corres
119.
by robryk 5y ago
> Check the ToS you don't own anything on Discord you even transfer copyright for every word you type. This is blatantly false. https://discord.com/terms under "your content" claims that I give Discord a f
120.
by robryk 5y ago
If you want to have a way to specify rules that use the same command, but still specify the rules manually, look up "!macros" in `man tup`. If the issue is that the commands need to write and read some temp files, then note that y

More ›