robbrown451

152 ms·

1501.
by robbrown451 15y ago
Disagree. Karma systems actually do that quite well, or at least have to potential to. Humans are like clay, and mold themselves to their environment. If you have an environment where there are no repercussions for bad behavior, you can
1502.
by robbrown451 15y ago
Yeah, well probably most trolls don't ever get that karma, so they troll instead. Also karma doesn't count for a lot here (that being one exception). Ultimately, a good karma system should simulate the what happens in the best real world e
1503.
by robbrown451 15y ago
I think the fact that you don't allow downvoting posts contributes to this. I get that you want to keep things positive. But when you don't provide an outlet for people who want to simply disagree without forcing them to come out of the w
1504.
by robbrown451 15y ago
I think HP would benefit if the mobile/tablet landscape was not so dominated and controlled by two of their competitors
1505.
by robbrown451 15y ago
Well, uh, I guess if you put it that way, I sure better.... Whether you want to debate whether the term "name calling" is accurate or not, I would suggest that the following fall astray of Hacker New's guidelines of "the principle here is n
1506.
by robbrown451 15y ago
I have no doubt that there would be a cost associated with hooking in Google's code. And I'll take you at your word that it's not NIH, even though a casual reader might guess that you might be a bit more personally invested in Javascript t
1507.
by robbrown451 15y ago
re: brand new: fine, wait until it isn't brand new re: lock in: I'd think Mozilla isn't really locked in as long as there is a cross-compiler. If you decide the the code bloat isn't worth the speed improvement (for the sites that run dart
1508.
by robbrown451 15y ago
so let me get this right: you are arguing that a problem with Dart is that other browser makers won't get on board, and you happen to be CTO of one of those browser makers? That seems a rather circular reason for dismissing it.