rmilejczz

8 ms·

61.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
If you read the post I linked he talks about what specific signatures his team plans to look for to determine if these objects are naturally occurring or artificial in nature. The only categorical claim he has made about this object is that
62.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
He has made no such claim, he simply maintains it as a possibility. Here’s a good medium article from Avi himself discussing that possibility and exactly how he intends to verify whether or not it actually is a possibility: https:/&#x
63.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
I agree, as someone who uses emulators to play mobile games often I don’t see any compelling reason to migrate from my current setup to use this. I’d probably just lose some functionality like the ability to record macros
64.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
I recommend that you try some mushrooms
65.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
Some channels I use for this: Action Button is indescribable, Fredrik Knudsen, Folding Ideas and Oki’s Weird Stories do excellent deep dives, JCS Criminal Psychology, Dreading, Dave’s Lemonade are all excellent channels focusing on courtroo
66.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
It’s not that we roll all our own stuff it’s just that most of us avoid opinionated frameworks. Example I’d wager most go backends are using gorm or sqlx because rolling your own orm would be insane for most
67.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
Just curious, why might we not be able to align super intelligence? I’m extremely ignorant in this space so forgive me if it’s a dumb question but I am definitely curious to learn more
68.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
It sort of depends I guess. I’m not a political historian but it depends on what that “authoritarianism” looks like. In general though, wouldnt authoritarianism exist to maintain a strict status quote? In that sense yes I would call it cons
69.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
You’re right it’s not even a method lol it’s a custom dom attribute. I had no idea
70.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
This function name amuses me because it implies there is a “safelySetInnerHTML” method Also shouts out to the UNSAFE_component methods, you’re a real hipster if you used those before the prefix
71.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
I don’t think they were talking about tories specifically just Britain as a whole being very conservative. Indeed as you’ve pointed out even the Labour Party in the UK is quite conservative. I would say the same is true of America, that muc
72.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
I agree with you but I think it’s disingenuous to pretend like the GPT 4 model without content restrictions wouldn’t significantly multiply the capability of malicious actors commit crimes.
73.
by rmilejczz 3y ago
Does an LLM need to “know” what a fact is? I think what you’re asserting is mostly philosophical, and it doesn’t affect the end result which is that you demonstrably can provide certain LLMs with incorrect information and have that informat
74.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
Honest question, has anyone ever been fired, imprisoned, or killed for saying that?
75.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
I feel like you’re reasoning is biased, I’ve seen cocaine usage for adults 18-25 reported around 0.8% to 2.0%, and it sustains an illegal industry. I unfortunately have no figures on bitcoin participation and couldn’t find anything decent w
76.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
But they didn’t become less popular either, and instead continued to rise and grow in popularity. That’s the point, outlawing it won’t stop it. If bitcoins were illegal then I imagine they would probably only be used in illegal transactions
77.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
>the person I was replying to suggested that some things are non-negotiable ( like rights ). This is simply not true. Fair enough, I missed this context and I do agree with the statement.
78.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
Are principles not also a social construct? Would you say that “no one has principles”? People absolutely do have rights, my government ensures that I do have a right to vote. It may be intangible but that doesn’t mean it’s not real, saying
79.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
The footer in the article.... if the voter doesn’t read the article I think it’s plainly obvious that they didn’t bother to open the article with the intent of reading it...
80.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
It’s only obvious when the article gets read, and in my experience many people who vote don’t bother to read
81.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
I’ve been wondering the same thing myself lately, the only advantage I can think of this accumulated information on the site (in the form of Q&As). I’d imagine a majority of SE traffic is people reading old questions, though if anyone k
82.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
While that passage is interesting in how it links to the article in OP, I find the article you shared to be significantly more interesting. I’ve always heard convincing links between poor sleep and poor health but I never knew there was suc
83.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
Honestly I disagree, HN seems impossible for me to gain any traction. My karma fluctuates from 0 to 10 on a daily basis essentially, and for seemingly no reason. Example, I made a comment earlier pointing out that North Korea tends to rejec
84.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
Part of the problem is that Peterson really obfuscated the nature of the legislation. It was never about whether or not misgendering someone is malicious, it added workplace protections against discrimination. Peterson, for the sake of his
85.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
Precisely? No definitely not precisely. The question at hand here is whether or not absence of pronouns constitutes misgendering, and the real crux of the issue is a lack of communication between staff and the moderator in question. I fail
86.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
As someone who has been quite active on SO for several years and is also new to HN I’ll definitely say that HN feels more hostile of an environment. Even when making an honest effort to engage in meaningful discussion you might get sent to
87.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
Sorry to nitpick but North Korea has historically chosen to be economically isolated (read about their government philosophy called “juche”), so it’s a weak example imo even in the presence of sanctions.
88.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
Cognitive empathy is distinguished from affective empathy; put simply cognitive empathy is your perception of another persons emotional state and affective empathy is your perception of the correct emotional response to another persons emot
89.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
Sure that’s fair, not really specific to Go though
90.
by rmilejczz 7y ago
>I looked into this but Go on a little OpenWrt router seemed… silly. Why? Go compiles to distributable binaries, Go binaries do not depend on Go to run. You wouldn’t need to actually install Go on the router

More ›