Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rmc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
67 ms
·
721.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
OSM doesn't need terrain data, since it would be very messy to store. And you can just combine OSM data with SRTM/ASTER/etc data if you want "ground heights"
722.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
There's also the continent/country/state level extracts on Geofabrik: http://download.geofabrik.de/ Or you can use osmosis to cut a file down to any arbitrary area: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org&#
723.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
> How do they figure out the building heights at all then? I don't know how this software does it, but people are tagging "number of floors" for buildings, and you can get a decent estimate of building heights from that
724.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
I presume you mean "Derived Database", which has a share alike (and attribution) requirement in the OSM licence. The other possibility is a "Produced Work" which only has an attribution requirement. Notably a map image g
725.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
In theory the UK is fully metric. In practice isn't not.
726.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
AFAIK US pints for aren't 568ml. Whoever said everything is bigger in America didn't include the beer.
727.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
Counter-example: In the 1980s, Irish workers in a large supermarket refused to handle South African goods because of apartheid https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/africa/how-11-striking...
728.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
In the 1980s, Irish workers in a large supermarket refused to handle South African goods because of apartheid https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/africa/how-11-striking...
729.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
Real Soon Now
730.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
And Threads was based on an optimistic Soviet nuclear attack, i.e. fewer weapons.
731.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
"No right is limitless" I agree. But some want no limits on speech, they want to be able to say any homophobic thing they want, on any forum. And when/if that is banned/removed they complain about free speech.
732.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
> Could you explain what you mean by this? The HN FAQ[1] has the rules/guidelines. e.g.: " Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say in a face-to-face conversation. Avoid gratuitous negativity.". It says guid
733.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
> This more or less means removing all challenging opinions and basically focus on being an echo chamber even more so than reddit. Basically thought-crime policing If you think left groups never disagree with each other, you're sa
734.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
Please suggest how I can hide (say) homophobia.
735.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
HN was delibrately set up to be "what reddit was at the start"
736.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
That might work if someone is overweight. Now, what if someone posts a message saying "kill urself faggot"
737.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
> I am staggered by the amount of people here who object to Imzy's "Be Nice"-policy on the basis that it limits free speech. It's especially curious, because HN does try to have a free speech uber alles approach. If
738.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
Emoji have been part of Unicode since 1993 (e.g. ️)
739.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
But surely you want some kind of filter bubble? Otherwise half (?) your webpages/content would be in Chinese, right? So surely you want an "English-language" filter bubble?
740.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
> What if my parents disapprove of him, cause he's from a "bad part of town"? Or what if your parents disapprove of him because you're male too.
741.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
> the idea that any of us would want to hide our locations from each other is simply not even a thing. There are plenty of gay kids who need to hide their location from their homophobic parents. Some parents are intensely homo/t
742.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
What a great way for homophobic parents to keep track of their gay kids and make sure they aren't hanging out at that LGBT centre, or with any LGBT-friendly people!
743.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
Well the Labour party in the UK brought in the National Health System in the late 1940s.
744.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
Has there been an independent third party audit of Uber's internal data security? Or do we just have to take Uber's word on it?
745.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
> but costumers can't take their data back. For a US company, yes. For EU companies, the EU privacy law says you can only use the data for the original purposes, and based on what the person consented to. You can't grab all d
746.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
Remember: If you're not in the USA, then US law doesn't protect your privacy! And US privacy law is nothing like EU privacy law. Has Uber considered reforming as a European company, under EU data protection law? That would a nice
747.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
Because sometimes people feel free to talk if they are anonymous. By calling the account "throwaway*" it tells people that this person is a regular and delibrately using a pseudonym
748.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
If they can tell you what to do, and you can't tell them what to do, then yes, you work under a boss.
749.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
Nothing stopping you doing that.
750.
▲
by
rmc
10y ago
That already exists. Just try posting a photo of a female nipple.
More ›