Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rmbyrro
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
271.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Price being a trade secret and legal fears for telling people a price number shows how far we are from a free market society. This is ridiculous. If there's one piece of information that is public by nature in a free market is price, f
272.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
In my family, helping a sister in this sort of dead end is exactly what a brother is expected to help with. It's not about 'telling my sister what to do'. It's about helping someone sick (my conclusion from your superfic
273.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
With a layperson in mind, curious about physics, do you recommend any resource (hopefully not too math-intensive) to learn how the higgs boson actually "gives mass" to stuff?
274.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
This could work in very small projects. Still very risky. Say you flag a write as "local". Later, some other place in your app starts relying on this write in another locality. If you don't update your write spec from "l
275.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Exactly. Did you expect a headline with that length?
276.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
The headline obviously can't answer everything, otherwise it wouldn't be called a headline. The body does address power efficiency. > There are a few caveats here, including that (...) MacBooks with Apple silicon also offer ind
277.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Of the island's male population
278.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
> a blow to the chipmaker as it tries to regain a technology lead it lost in recent years to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Is it a blow, though? I'd expect exactly a big loss if they're investing to regain market leadershi
279.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
If you use it in Fedora, sure
280.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
They should have a lot more troops involved, for sure, but GEF can be very efficient by leveraging surveillance tech. Brazil deployed SIVAM [1] about 20 years ago. At the time it was a state-of-the-art radar surveillance system. Not sure ho
281.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
I respect their choice of license. Totally agree they shouldn't let Redi$ take their work after what Redi$ have done. But still let any kind of project use it, including cloud vendors. Downside is that Valkey won't be able to use
282.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
> contribute over $1M to its annual budget That on top of developer hours dedicated to various projects, which are probably worth multiple millions.
283.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
This is so obvious that needing to say it shows how prejudice can blind people.
284.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
You should have more discretion with those ideas or disclose irony clearly, which I hope is the case here.
285.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
> people seem to be more interested in integration than developing new ml tech Isn't this true for every tech, though? And a natural fact of life? Think of databases. There's many times more jobs for "integrating" a D
286.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
It's not "necessary", but, when combined with a tarpit on port 22: 1. You can monitor if your private key is compromised and automatically rotate it. 2. It's fun to mess around with hackers and script kidies.
287.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Do you have any idea of what constitutes an OSS project besides characters written on an versioned repository?
288.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Companies can make plenty of money. What they can't - without giving the middle finger to OSS - is satisfy greed. If you want to satisfy greed, fine, but be like Oracle. Sell a commercial license upfront. Don't pretend to be OSS.
289.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
OSS users don't complain about AWS wrapping around it. It's very much welcome. The greedy people behind businesses managing OSS are concerned, because they are not satisfied with making money. They want to be THE ONLY ONES making
290.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
You apparently are not familiar with the concept of software maintenance, upgrade, security patches. Or completely ignored it when wrote this comment.
291.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
It's not risky. For anything serious that can be an attractive target, it's a matter of time before getting doomed.
292.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Wait, who's using SSH pass auth? Folks, private keys. Change your SSH port and use an SSH tarpit on port 22.
293.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Those are hell of big contributions. It'd be worth billions if Postgres was a greed-driven enterprise (like Redis, Elastic, Mongo). And this value is now available and enjoyed by everyone on Earth.
294.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Just tell everyone you're dealing with that your primary purpose is getting rich with the software. Don't tell them you have always been and always will be open source, just until you're big and give the middle finger to OSS
295.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Nobody's saying screw VCs. We say screw to fooling your users that you're an OSS adopter and supporter, just until your project is big and you can say screw OSS.
296.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Monetization-era
297.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
They want to make ludicrous profits on the software others have built for them. There's nothing wrong with making money and being profitable. But they have to justify investments taken with greed. This license change is motivated by gr
298.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
You are presuming everyone has the same needs as you had when assessing Redis, which is a bit naive, if I may share my opinion.
299.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
Linux distros also infuriate me sometimes, but: 1. I'm not using Mac-jail-OS 2. I'm not insane to even remotely consider the possibility of using Windows So, yea, I'm using OpenSearch.
300.
▲
by
rmbyrro
3y ago
You are correct. The issue is that any [X]GPL license has bad reputation in business environments. They see it as a big legal risk that will require constant legal supervision over the technical usage of GPL-licensed code.
More ›