Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rlt
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
121.
▲
by
rlt
9mo ago
What's the process for getting an agent like Claude Code to use jscpd effectively? I assume it's just another tool call with some basic prompting?
122.
▲
by
rlt
10mo ago
I don’t we’re at the “companies bought too many GPUs” stage yet. My understanding is they still can’t get enough GPUs, or data centers to put them in, or power to run them. Most companies don’t even own them, they rent from the clouds. We
123.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
If Starship achieves full and “rapid” reusability then it seems like it would be a lot more feasible to collect and deorbit space junk.
124.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
It’s entirely possible a company like Tesla would not exist, or at least would be delayed by many years, if it weren’t started in the US.
125.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
I used to think engineers should get all the credit for the successes of big engineering projects, and they should probably get more credit than they do, but over time I’ve realized how important good leadership is. SpaceX and Tesla absolut
126.
▲
Metabase Community Data Stack Report 2025
(metabase.com)
3 points
by
rlt
1y ago
|
0 comments
127.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
“The only difference between your phone and China's social credit system is that China tells you what they're doing.” Weird take. There’s a massive difference between a centralized government-run system and a decentralized system
128.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
I didn't mean this ship and booster, I mean in a year or so when they're done with the test phase and frequently launching Starlink satellites on Starship.
129.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
What exactly do you think is the “more technology development than the current flights actually show“ needed to get into and out of orbit? My impression is they just need to leave the engines on a little longer to get to orbit, then turn th
130.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
They mentioned in the stream they were intentionally stressing the ship on reentry. But yes, “rapid reusability” is a ways off. I expect they’ll be spending weeks inspecting and repairing ship and booster before reflight for a few years, bu
131.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
The nice thing about SpaceX’s rapid iteration philosophy (and having Starlink as its first “customer”) is that they can account for engine unreliability by building extra margin into early launches, fly with reduced payloads, collect data o
132.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
“Tries to block” is different than “fights for a piece of the same pie”. While Starlink is never going to compete with fiber purely on speed, it’s available now, cheaper, and fast enough for residential customers. It will get faster over ti
133.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
> Luckily we now are able to launch stuff into orbit a lot cheaper. Including astronomy related hardware. Honestly once Starship is operational SpaceX should subsidize launches of non-commercial astronomy hardware. Could build some goodw
134.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
Very cool, any maybe some people are better at managing clutter, but I would make a huge mess of this space in days. The EE lab would put it over the top for me.
135.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
“primarily a jobs program and basically only thing propping up Americans manufacturing” Not just a jobs program, but it is strategically important to national security to retain the ability to manufacture military hardware (or at least alon
136.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
> And it's not actually tax payer money but freshly minted dollars that are created through debt Minting dollars is a form of taxation (albeit one partially paid by foreign entities that hold dollars)
137.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
The discovering itself doesn’t seem like the interesting part. If the discovery wasn’t in the training data then it’s a sign AI can produce novel scientific research / experiments.
138.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
The coolest thing about this is apparently it’s written by Jack Dorsey, billionaire founder of Twitter/Square. https://x.com/jack/status/1941989435962212728 Cool to see he still gets his hands dirty in code.
139.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
Lightning network depends on… the internet… so if both clients are on the internet why not just send messages over that?
140.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
What makes you think that?
141.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
Ok, but that’s a trade off anyone who works for a private company makes, and it’s never called an “effective cliff”.
142.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
React was released in like 2013. We were well on our way to the web being unusable with JavaScript disabled by then.
143.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
Andrew Bosworth (CTO of Meta) being commissioned as a Lieutenant Colonel in a new unit of the US Army Reserve is even more interesting in this light. https://x.com/boztank/status/1933512877140316628?s=46
144.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
They don’t have voting power.
145.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
Massive difference. You can vest and move on, even if you don’t have liquidity, which most private companies don’t for employees anyway.
146.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
Meta “will have a 49% stake in the artificial intelligence startup, but will not have any voting power” Wouldn’t Scale’s board/execs still have a fiduciary duty to existing shareholders, not just Meta?
147.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
Previous articles about this suggested the connections were routed through a government datacenter nearby. Is that not the case?
148.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
They’re in a pissing match. The relationship between SpaceX and the federal government is mutually beneficial. I would be surprised if either follows through on their threats.
149.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
By my estimate, SpaceX has saved the US government 10s of billions by reducing launch costs with Falcon 9, developing Dragon, Starlink, etc.
150.
▲
by
rlt
1y ago
Can you elaborate?
More ›