rlt

5 ms·

61.
by rlt 4mo ago
I think that's the point the parent comment was making.
62.
by rlt 4mo ago
It’s almost like you can each pick data to fit your narrative.
63.
by rlt 4mo ago
> But what is being discussed are 100 MW space data centers. Make the calculations....Those need a 20 x 20 mile radiator and a solar farm the same size. Those are space constructions at scifi level maybe for the next century. No one is t
64.
by rlt 5mo ago
Nit: there’s nothing “cryptographic” about reproducible builds. “Reproducible build” already usually implies bit-by-bit reproducibility.
65.
by rlt 5mo ago
How much do you hate Elon Musk?
66.
by rlt 5mo ago
Well, yes, garbage in garbage out. That's a given and not what's meant by "hallucination" in this context.
67.
by rlt 5mo ago
“expendable upper stage” So not at all a rival to Starship.
68.
by rlt 5mo ago
No.
69.
by rlt 5mo ago
I’m not talking about smart select, but generative AI. It can certainly be used as a tool in art.
70.
by rlt 5mo ago
Most clip art is actual art like my child’s drawings are “art”.
71.
by rlt 5mo ago
Most “AI art” is art like “clip art” is art. This is a phase that will pass. There will be (and already are) legitimate artists who leverage AI as a creative tool like any other medium/tool (Photoshop, cameras, paint brushes, etc). I r
72.
by rlt 6mo ago
> I'm not sure what benefit it is for people to point out such mistakes A feeling of superiority, of course
73.
by rlt 6mo ago
Hah, I didn't know until just now they weren't part of the design.
74.
by rlt 6mo ago
> People like to freak out about this, so I wanted to post it here to make sure that everyone who wants to freak out about it gets the opportunity to do so. I've grown to appreciate unapologetic trolling of people who care way too m
75.
by rlt 6mo ago
We're talking about SpaceX, not Tesla or xAI, which only very recently joined SpaceX.
76.
by rlt 6mo ago
Do you have any evidence of this? I don’t think there have been a lot of high profile departures in the past few years.
77.
by rlt 6mo ago
Ok I’ll try: Starship becomes “fully and rapidly reusable”, needing little to no refurbishment between launches. Then the lower bound of launch costs is just the expendables (methane, oxygen, nitrogen) which could cost as little as $1M per
78.
by rlt 6mo ago
Source: https://x.com/LeoLabs_Space/status/2038680177408880719
79.
by rlt 7mo ago
This is one of those things as a pedantic technologist I've had to accept, like DJs referring to USB thumb drives they store their music on as "USBs".
80.
by rlt 7mo ago
The vast majority of Starlink satellites do have laser interconnect now. They started launching them in 2021 or 2022 I believe.
81.
by rlt 7mo ago
I feel like we need a distributed system/protocol that allows people to have pseudonyms not linked to their real identity, but with a shared reputation/trust score, so if you’re a bad actor using a pseudonym your real identity and
82.
by rlt 7mo ago
Enjoy it while it lasts.
83.
by rlt 8mo ago
Is it really that amazing? It’s a pretty simple idea, and seemed pretty buggy when I tried it out.
84.
by rlt 8mo ago
Does any credible approach to prompt injection even exist?
85.
by rlt 8mo ago
Don’t forget “Moltbot” between “Clawdbot” and “OpenClaw”! I think that named lasted about 24 hours, but it was long enough to spawn MoltBook.
86.
by rlt 8mo ago
Is he? My impression of Clawdbot was it was a good idea but not particularly technically impressive or even well-written. I had all kinds of issues setting it up.
87.
by rlt 8mo ago
Three-minute dramas?! That sounds like an eternity. Most content on Tik Tok is under a minute.
88.
by rlt 8mo ago
They should try the same thing but replace the original spell names with something else.
89.
by rlt 8mo ago
I agree he leans into the hype aggressively, and spends too much time on Twitter, but they are making progress regardless. Starlink is growing rapidly. Starship has been making steady progress. Neuralink is helping ~12 real people with spin
90.
by rlt 8mo ago
Not all AI workloads are latency sensitive.

More ›