rk06

59 ms·

751.
by rk06 10y ago
As far html vs jsx goes, i would say its a matter of taste. But when it comes to css, vue's css are way better than React's alternative by a longshot.
752.
by rk06 10y ago
>But, TypeScript is optional in [..] Angular2, typescript is not optional. Just look at the official docs. the js version of docs are still incompelte even though 2.1 has been released. >it's true that Google uses/develops A
753.
by rk06 10y ago
Everything else. Vue is view layer only. Major difference would that Vue uses dependency tracking for change detection while angular 1 uses digest cycle & dirty checking. For more differences, consider this (likely biased) comparison:
754.
by rk06 10y ago
Evan has added a dozen collaborators to Vue team. so it is no longer a single developer project. Yes, the majority of code is still written by Evan, due to speed required. but we know that vue is heading in right direction.
755.
by rk06 10y ago
When I looked into it some months back, I arrived at following : >Template syntax wise it's mostly subjective preference: Ractive uses mustache templates, Vue uses attribute bindings. >Vue has a more intricate reactivity system -
756.
by rk06 10y ago
Speed is a problem in any reasonably complex app. While i might say that riot's speed won't be an issue in 80℅ cases, what about the 20% cases? And its not like difference in speed is small. As the benchmark(i linked in first post
757.
by rk06 10y ago
Yeah, but v-model is a good 2-way binding. So it can't be removed
758.
by rk06 10y ago
Riot sounds good, but what about performance? last time I checked riot performed quite bad in terms of performance. An example: https://cdn.rawgit.com/krausest/js-framework-benchmark/956b0...
759.
by rk06 10y ago
But you can move html, css and js into separate file by linking them from .vue file using src imports[1] [1]( http://vue-loader.vuejs.org/en/start/spec.html )
760.
by rk06 10y ago
Vue is actually quite a good choice as Vue can be used for both SPAs & multi page apps and Vue is easier to learn. Compare to: - angular 1: marked as deprecated - angular 2: Built for SPAs only. - aurelia: Built for SPAs only. - React
761.
Aurelis JavaScript RC released(blog.durandal.io)
1 points by rk06 10y ago|0 comments
762.
by rk06 10y ago
I bought gionee marathon m4 because it has the best battery. so some people do buy phones with better battery.
763.
by rk06 10y ago
I bet 10$ that he can not even do "hello world" in react.
764.
by rk06 10y ago
>Lots of outdated information about old versions of the frameworks. I completely disagree. They always have very few and vague info which somehow does not change with time. you know like, angular is slow but has lots of tutorials. etc
765.
by rk06 10y ago
> However I really miss a Ember.js as example of successful story. >Is it a a badly designed framework? Or just there isn't any huge company behind it? Ember has both. It is not mentioned the purpose of those articles is adverti
766.
by rk06 10y ago
I wish there was an edit button, like SO, on HackerNews.
767.
by rk06 11y ago
Congrats on the RC.
768.
by rk06 11y ago
aurelia hype is there for those who research before choosing a frontend framework.
769.
by rk06 11y ago
this is a release candidate, wait for actual release before diving into details.
770.
by rk06 11y ago
I hear a lot about angular and that it has gotten quite a competition from react, aurelia and vue. I personally will never use react. but i want to know, in which situations, it would be better to use angular and in which situations it woul
771.
by rk06 11y ago
short answer: "No". Explanation: In js land, Long term Support means "6 months". so your best bet is to have a framework which makes migrations easy and does not introduce changes. With angular being backed by google, th
772.
by rk06 11y ago
React is not the only competitor either. Aurelia and Vue are there to make up for react's problems.
773.
by rk06 11y ago
duplicate of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11582441 this article is posted on vuejs.org while previous article was posted on medium. they are the same.
774.
by rk06 11y ago
if you like react, then, imo, you should stick with react. What i find best about vue is that lack of boilerplate and jsx. Vue's scoped css + css preprocessor+ auto-prefix combo is a huge step toward modular css. I am certain that ot
775.
by rk06 11y ago
in "attack on titan" (fiction), apocalypse happens and humanity is hit the hardest. but no, it does not bring any good. instead people do atrocious and horrible deeds in the name of greater good. So, I would say, "No, apocaly
776.
by rk06 11y ago
to me, ember is the only source of peace in js framework wars. I do not use it yet.(cause i am js noob). but if i require a full blown js framework, ember will be my choice.
777.
by rk06 11y ago
have you tried vue? it has similar syntax but does not require polyfills.
778.
by rk06 11y ago
Man, it sounds as if the author has suffered from js framework hell and thinks all frameworks for all languages are bad.