rk06

29 ms·

451.
by rk06 5y ago
Full version of conclusion, by swyx : https://www.swyx.io/state-of-js-2021/
452.
by rk06 5y ago
No, it is not. Unless you are planning to use your experience for getting a job, it is not worth it. I would advise you to use vue or svelte.
453.
by rk06 5y ago
Angular has its pros and cons. The biggest con would be slow builds. They also feel even slower if you try react/vue/svelte/solid on vite.
454.
by rk06 5y ago
It is literally the second most used js framework in the survey. While I am no fan of angular, I think angular is on right track. Once they support non-NgModule and vite, their satisfaction will improve.
455.
by rk06 5y ago
Ember is in “SPA” space, so it is competing against other big js frameworks like angular and Aurelia. Angular is super famous and is backed by google,so it is more used, than ember. On the other hand, react & vue are in “view layer” wit
456.
by rk06 5y ago
Most likely due to vue 2 to 3 transition. Vue 3 introduced many improvements and breaking changes. This also made many libraries lose compatibility with Vue 3. Not a good thing. While vue 3 was soft launched a year ago. The transition is st
457.
by rk06 5y ago
“Satisfaction” basically means “hype”. That’s why solid and svelte are lower in “usage” rankings while Angular is second in usage. Only Vite has great satisfaction (98%) and decent usage (30%).
458.
by rk06 5y ago
It is interesting point that blade's component feature is inspired by Vue.
459.
by rk06 5y ago
I first tried to learn react in 2015. And I gave up after failing to control webpack. I googled other options and found vue.vue worked and made sense to me. Last year, I participated in a hackathon and needed a GUI interface. So, I picked h
460.
by rk06 5y ago
It was great effort. It included reactivity internals updated to proxies, composition api, typescript support, EJS modules adoption etc. and all that including surrounding core libraries and docs.
461.
by rk06 5y ago
Vuex is going in direction of pinia. While Vuex has a v3 compatible build, it is there to ease migration, not as recommended for new vue 3 users
462.
by rk06 5y ago
Vue has better DX. In comparison to react hooks: 1. Vue has automatic dependency detection 2. Vue’ composables can be used outside of vue component 3. Do not suffer from over rendering or stale closure And that is just hooks. Vue also ha
463.
by rk06 5y ago
That someone else can put a tablet in front of me and it will unlock. And it’s effectiveness with beard, masks etc. I have found fingerprint sensors to be both reliable and not easy for others to bypass
464.
by rk06 5y ago
For now, yes. Just a couple of weeks back, I was looking for a tablet with decent specs and a headphone jack and a fingerprint sensor (I don’t trust face unlock). And there were zero android tablet matching that criteria. While budget iPad
465.
by rk06 5y ago
Vue supports standard js/html/css. It is react which reinventing everything
466.
by rk06 5y ago
Polymorphism can replace multiple if/else/switch/case with a single one. It has benefits, if you do not apply it dogmatically everywhere
467.
by rk06 5y ago
> more than half of it is a bunch of API calls, state management, authentication, and error handling that honestly does not provide much value to the product that we’re offering Authentication and error handling are deal breakers, hence
468.
by rk06 5y ago
“No, but yes”. If you want high paying job, you need some way to demonstrate that you are smart enough and distinguish yourself from others. Leetcode is one way to do it. Other way is to demonstrate your work contribution. But what if you
469.
by rk06 5y ago
This is a great article, but the title is stupid as it gets. “better” is better. If your definition of “better” doesn’t match reality, then you should correct your definition of “better” and “worse”. Instead of saying “everyone, except me,
470.
by rk06 5y ago
I had used some registry hacks to disable the new context menu. And now have installed explorer patch (mentioned in article and this thread) to fix other issues. You should give it a shot!
471.
by rk06 5y ago
Now, it is easier to have stacked windows. Say you have 3-4 windows, and want them stacked. If you hover mouse over the maximise button, you get option to have a special layout. Also, it put the final nail IE11’s coffin. Since Win 11 does
472.
by rk06 5y ago
> most crucially essentially none of the designers use Windows. That explains a lot. Not having the designers dogfood their work is serious oversight As an MSFT employee, I have no choice but to use win 11. And suffer from taskbar annoya
473.
Tell HN: StateofJS Survey Is Open(stateofjs.com)
1 points by rk06 5y ago|0 comments
474.
by rk06 5y ago
What exactly virtualenv adds to table that justifies it? I have used c#, and javascript. And not felt any issues by lack of virtualenv. I know python need it because otherwise it does not support project level modules. But that is a python
475.
by rk06 5y ago
In browser land, the less code you ship, the better. Removing dead js code is hard, because of its dynamic nature and using common js imports making it harder for treeshaking algorithms. So, people had incentive to write and use smaller pac
476.
by rk06 5y ago
Allow package deletion within 1 week and 100 download will suffice.
477.
by rk06 5y ago
No, EJS is a template library. While frontend frameworks(vue, svelte, react) have templates, their main focus is on syncing js with html. So, not only EJS is strictly less useful than any FE framework, at 22kb (min) it is also heavier than
478.
by rk06 5y ago
When I read that line, I thought svelte should be the one. But no, they chose something with even less documentation, community and tooling support
479.
by rk06 5y ago
They wanted it under 15kb. And for some reason, give future devs ability to not use Vue. I don’t know how they settled on 15kb, but “don’t want to force people of future” is as stupid of a reason as I have seen. Surely, “people of future” c
480.
by rk06 5y ago
> When you operate at this type of scale, centralization is the enemy of efficiency. This is a paradox. In order to be efficient on a macro level, it requires being (very) inefficient at the micro level. Counterexample: amazon if every t

More ›