rjaco31

11 ms·

61.
by rjaco31 11y ago
You're pretty harsh with yourself. You showed that you were interested in the topic and that you could learn it by yourself. I don't think anyone expect an intern to already master the subject he'll be working on, picking a s
62.
by rjaco31 11y ago
It would be great, but in most computer fraud cases, actual damage is almost impossible to quantify. (or you end up with stupidity like "$5 per song, so damages sum up to 2 millions"..)
63.
by rjaco31 11y ago
That's a seriously fucked-up webpage without Javascript =/ http://i.imgur.com/Lr53m7u.png
64.
by rjaco31 11y ago
Oh, I was so confused by this sentence indeed.
65.
by rjaco31 11y ago
He raised the "you cant lean without having your shadow masking everything" problem
66.
by rjaco31 11y ago
Because it's usually potential damage instead of actual damage.
67.
by rjaco31 11y ago
I'm not sure I understood your point. You have all of this on reddit.
68.
by rjaco31 11y ago
It's pretty hard to find as much content as Youtube elsewhere, from experience all the youtube-wannabe websites have tremendously less content. Or do you have a link?
69.
by rjaco31 11y ago
Reading your post a few times, I don't really see the difference. Your last sentence perfectly summarizes small subreddits and cross-posts.
70.
by rjaco31 11y ago
You don't even have to "bribe/blackmail/torture" them, a subpoena will be sufficient in most countries.
71.
by rjaco31 11y ago
>And 4096 bit, does that help at all? If a CA is 2048 then doesn't that max out the trust chain? Not if you use certificate pinning, but otherwise yes, you'd only have to crack the weakest cert of the chain (or well, of any c
72.
by rjaco31 11y ago
From the Mozilla page: >Note: The current specification requires including a second pin for a backup key which isn't yet used in production. This allows for changing the server's public key without breaking accessibility for cl
73.
by rjaco31 11y ago
On the other hand, it's his job to promote FUD in order to get more funding for his agency..
74.
by rjaco31 11y ago
This is highly unlikely, there are numerous proofs of natural materials with way higher energetic density.
75.
by rjaco31 11y ago
I get your point, but it's more of an ideological battle here. Those people want to be legally allowed to run an exit node, not to use a compromised box & hide their tracks.
76.
by rjaco31 11y ago
They could find this suspicious and search harder for bogus stuff, but the point is it's your right and thus it cannot be held against you in court. Talking too much & giving them enough materials for false testimony or pseudo-conf
77.
by rjaco31 11y ago
<Personal opinion> The thing is, those "brand new things" are usually not that new & more about fancy marketing than truly new stuff. Any developer with 15+ years of experience will have an easier time learning this stuf
78.
by rjaco31 11y ago
I guess you wouldn't try to be a smartass in such a situation. Parole violation means going back to jail.
79.
by rjaco31 12y ago
That was official government documents. Here the difference is that it's people emails.
80.
by rjaco31 12y ago
The one that managed the FBI to give them a cover story with the whole "North Korea" stuff might be a good start.
81.
by rjaco31 12y ago
They stay private because it's in your interest that they stay so. There is nothing illegal about making your own mails public if you wish so (except if you signed a NDA).
82.
by rjaco31 12y ago
That's actually maybe the only good point about the whole NSA interception thing, they indeed force us to step up our game.
83.
by rjaco31 12y ago
That's really not compelling enough to learn the differences & break backward compatibility imho
84.
by rjaco31 12y ago
> Internet.org doesn’t block or throttle any other services or create fast lanes -- and it never will. Wait what? It's basically blocking everything except their services, did I miss something?
85.
by rjaco31 12y ago
But then why didn't they give you a shitty bandwidth when you try to access such remote content? That would be fair game, instead of capping the global data transferred over a month..
86.
by rjaco31 12y ago
Those seem to be very fair points, but you didn't care to elaborate what are the implied negatives of the Sudbury system in your opinion?
87.
by rjaco31 12y ago
On the other hand, they are kids that are building their social models around those interactions, it might be very different from your usually company meeting.
88.
by rjaco31 12y ago
The hard part is finding incentives not to get corrupted once you're in place.
89.
by rjaco31 12y ago
If you provide free capped connections to the end-users (with selected services not counting toward the cap), that would be a totally different discussion indeed. But that's not the case here.
90.
by rjaco31 12y ago
Wow, there are actual countries with bandwidth cap and privileged content for Home Internet? Damn, I thought that was just the hypothetical scarecrow of NN defenders =/

More ›