risyachka

4 ms·

31.
by risyachka 4mo ago
Cursors target users are not developers but casual vibe coders.
32.
by risyachka 4mo ago
>> Who is it trying to appeal to? To me. I want to have access to whatsapp/browser but with constraints of T9 so that I am not tempted to jump from website to website or write a lot. And I want a phone that does not look like the
33.
by risyachka 4mo ago
But this is exactly what I meant. You need expertise. But you can acquire it only by doing. So LLMs won't help you here. You need to put in the work.
34.
by risyachka 4mo ago
>> Getting the best results out of these models requires skill, experience, intuition, and domain expertise. domain expertise has nothing to do with llms. On the contrary, to have it you need to avoid llms. >>you risk prompting
35.
by risyachka 4mo ago
>> he would have learned nothing about the AI there is absolutely zero value in spending time to learn about new models as in few months new model will be out and whatever you learned about the current one will be useless. Also with m
36.
by risyachka 4mo ago
This. LLMs helping implement many ideas is a curse and the results speak for themselves. As a non-designer I want to see a thought through 1-2 ideas, not 10 ideas you coded with llm and now the burden of thinking which one is better and why
37.
by risyachka 4mo ago
>> It’s more effective to throw everything in using LLMs, then using human judgment to sculpt away. Not really. Maybe its effective from designer side but from other side that has to review all those ideas it is exhausting and counter
38.
by risyachka 4mo ago
This is direct result of AI as you can see in many other public repos. before AI like 1 in 1000 would spend their time fixing something they had no idea about and even then considering how much time you spent and how few of those happened i
39.
by risyachka 5mo ago
> Both are wars instigated by the leaders of great powers having nukes and a lot of empty land does not make russia "great power", and their war results match this.
40.
by risyachka 5mo ago
they are quickly turning into a slop shop instead of polishing their existing products (and most of them do require a lot of work) they jump into any other niche someone thought was a good idea. My guess is that with ai being able to protot
41.
by risyachka 5mo ago
In order to use C you need to actually understand it, also toolchain is more complex etc. Which makes it a no go for 99%. Rust is so safe that anyone can vibe it without any idea what is going on there. Which is basically what is happening
42.
by risyachka 5mo ago
Except the competition was essentially non existent and no one would copy your product with llm in a day
43.
by risyachka 5mo ago
>> so that even legal immigration is restricted or difficult like it was simple and easy before that. Now it becomes borderline impossible
44.
by risyachka 5mo ago
No one reads code that results from this. Those who say otherwise either lie or are very bad developers which is essentially the same as not reading that code.
45.
by risyachka 5mo ago
just fyi its also russian
46.
by risyachka 5mo ago
I may have missed it but are those tests written by person or generated? Otherwise how do you know they even test anything (like actually test, not appear to test)
47.
by risyachka 5mo ago
Thats the single reason it is faster. Just pushing to prod whatever. All projects can become fast if they drop guardrails. This does not correlate with productivity increase
48.
by risyachka 5mo ago
This is because AI is most appealing to average and below average developers and users because it makes them feel like they can finally do something.
49.
by risyachka 5mo ago
At this point bun is a free adspace for Anthropic and Claude. This is the only thing that would explain the rewrite
50.
by risyachka 5mo ago
Humans can already have 4 hour work week without productivity loss. But I only see mass layoffs and those who are working - are working longer and harder then before.
51.
by risyachka 5mo ago
The analogy is AI music produced without effort in seconds, not recorded music.
52.
by risyachka 5mo ago
llms are nothing like hammers or other tools. They are factories that product goods on a whim. There is nothing to compare them to as we never had anything like that. This is not industrial revolution this is obliteration of work at its cor
53.
by risyachka 5mo ago
the biggest issue with llms is that they make those who have no idea what they are doing seem like they know something. >> without the limitation of your ability to hand code it. yeah its nice though this in 100% of cases results of
54.
by risyachka 5mo ago
In coding the ambiguity is very, very limited and constrained compared to any non dev job that involves any decision making
55.
by risyachka 5mo ago
This is so on point that I want to cry.
56.
by risyachka 5mo ago
Right? All high quality coffee makers use a proper method so there is absolutely zero downside in decaf. Just make sure to check which method they use (all big ones state it on their website or else)
57.
by risyachka 6mo ago
>> Again, not necessarily bad in itself, yeah, it is bad. Human brain is not able to properly assess this amount of changes. To understand even a small change you need a lot of capacity. To understand thousands of lines - impossible.
58.
by risyachka 6mo ago
How does this solve the issue? 4.6 will be disabled after one or more release like any other legacy model.
59.
by risyachka 6mo ago
Frontend, backend, workflow engines, payments, idk all of it. Like you can make a cross-platform react native app with expo in a day without any AI (a proper app, not a boilerplate). Same with many web apps. Shadcn with themes and component
60.
by risyachka 6mo ago
You can always have a dynamic pool based on your load of ready to use docker containers, then it takes like 15 seconds and is faster than basically any sandbox provider.

More ›