Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ristos
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
ristos
3y ago
These issues get mentioned a lot, you just haven't noticed I guess. Sourceforge is also an issue with some C libraries too, I'm guessing because it was done a long time ago? not sure. I use ECL because it has really good C interop
62.
▲
by
ristos
3y ago
This does keep coming up, and it's a few years old now. I think Quicklisp can easily still support https while supporting the older packages that are tar+http, which could easily be mirrored in a git repo. Quicklisp has unfortunately t
63.
▲
Ask HN: Where you do buy DRM-free, watermarked content?
2 points
by
ristos
4y ago
|
3 comments
64.
▲
by
ristos
6y ago
This looks so awesome! It's got the best parts of a lot of languages. This is what sticks out to me: - Really simple lisp like scheme, but reminds me of lua (and not bloated like CL) - Has resumable fibers, no callcc like scheme - Not
65.
▲
by
ristos
6y ago
Afaict all of these rely on the axiom of Archimedes which is what I'm talking about, some of the proofs explicitly stating it and others implicitly. Unless I missed something.
66.
▲
by
ristos
6y ago
Why is your proof for every natural number n and not infinity (ω)? also isn't the law of excluded middle axiomatic?
67.
▲
by
ristos
6y ago
That's the point I'm trying to make actually. 1/infinity is an infinite series, which would be a computation that takes infinite time to compute. Saying that 0.9999...=1 is saying that the infinite series is the same as that
68.
▲
by
ristos
6y ago
I don't think that 0.999... = 1 is actually provable. I think this and all of calculus is actually axiomatic, which has the following axiom: Given ε = 1/∞ then: ε = 0 Am I wrong in thinking this way? It seems as though there'
69.
▲
by
ristos
7y ago
Is it possible to add more specificity to the guidelines for REMOTE? ie: US only, EU only, x-y timezones only, US/EU citizen, etc Otherwise there ends up being a lot of back and forth and wasted time over something that's solved i
70.
▲
by
ristos
7y ago
Yeah you can do optional static typing in common lisp: https://medium.com/@MartinCracauer/static-type-checking-in-t... The typing discipline in strong. I think it also has type inference but I'm not 100% sure