Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
riskable
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
121.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
I've been saying for quite some time now that AI is going to kill the traditional (free) search engine. This is just another nail in the coffin. When an AI searches google.com for you, the ads never get shown to the user. Search engi
122.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Is there any more annoying popup than the newsletter popup? I'd rather see a targeted ad than that BS. NO! I do not want your newsletter! I wouldn't even have an email address if it wasn't absolutely required to operate
123.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Press X to diagnose
124.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Imagine the bureaucracy, trying to manage IPv6-based blocking. MPAA: "Yeah, we're going to need to you to add eighteen quintillion more addresses to the block list..."
125.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
I've been using the compose key for over a decade but only recently discovered you can type compose <dash><dash><dash> to produce an em dash. Before then, I always just typed a double-dash (--) to simulate it.
126.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
I suddenly have the urge to reply to this with a bulleted list where the bullets are emoji.
127.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Exposure to AI leads to people writing like AI . Just like when you're hanging out in certain circles, you start to talk like those people. It's human nature.
128.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Another take: Microsoft admitted under oath in France that the US government doesn't care enough about French data to ever have requested any. I'm sure if you asked the current administration what they think of France, they'd
129.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
This administration hates heroes.
130.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
My take: Large: Requires >128GB VRAM Medium: 32-128GB VRAM Small: 16GB VRAM Micro: Runs on a microcontroller or GPUs with just 4GB of VRAM There's really nothing worthwhile for general use cases that runs in under 16GB (from my test
131.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Hopefully this will put pressure on the market to produce much more efficient AI models. As opposed to bigger, then bigger, and then even BIGGER models (which is the current trend). FYI: gpt-oss:120b is better at coding (in benchmarks an
132.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Ah, that's the thing: "on page load". A one-time expense! If you're using modern page routing, "loading a new URL" isn't actually loading a new page... The client is just simulating it via your router
133.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
After all my years of web development, my rules are thus: * If the browser has an optimal path for it, use HTTP (e.g. images where it caches them automatically or file uploads where you get a "free" progress API). * If I
134.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Yes and no: There's still a rather large latency improvement even when you're using plain HTTP (not that you should go without encryption). I was very curious so I asked AI to explain why websockets would have such lower latency
135.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
It's a lot more complicated than that. If I have a 15MB .js file and it's just a collection of functions that get called on-demand (later), that's going to have a very, very low overhead because modern JS engines JIT compile
136.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
I was going to say... The size of the JS only matters the first time you download it unless there's a lot of tiny files instead of a bundle or two. What the article is complaining about doesn't seem like it's root cause o
137.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Tried that. I hit the limit way too fast. Faster than Claude Code, even! GPT5-codex (medium) is such a token hog for some reason
138.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
I find the "slop" thing interesting because—to me—it looks like laziness. In the same way that anyone can tell ChatGPT to write something for them instead of writing it themselves and just having it check the work... Or going thro
139.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
Don't rule out laziness! I'm a very experienced senior dev (full stack, embedded, Rust, Python, web everything, etc)... Could I have spent a ton of time learning the ins and outs of Yjs (and the very special way in which you can i
140.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
With all the LLM coding assistants, you have to get a feel for each model and which extension/interface you're using with them. Not only that, but it's also dependent on your project! For example, if you're writing a c
141.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
If you're using btrfs, you do get that feature: https://moritzmolch.com/blog/2506.html
142.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
It also doesn't make sense for `process()` to be an attribute of `result`. Why would you instantiate a class and call it result‽
143.
▲
by
riskable
11mo ago
My hypothesis: This is why AI is fantastic as a coding assistant but not so great at other things. A software developer—after watching an AI model fail over and over again, trying to say, fix a difficult bug—will stop and approach the iss
144.
▲
by
riskable
1y ago
I don't think it's possible to say how far away or "never" it is. All we know is that LLMs cannot become AGI. My prediction: AGI will come from a strange place. An interesting algorithm everyone already knew about that g
145.
▲
by
riskable
1y ago
Z.ai is on the US Entities (banned from export/collab) list: > “These entities advance the People’s Republic of China’s military modernization through the development and integration of advanced artificial intelligence research. Thi
146.
▲
by
riskable
1y ago
No, the AI will just use Google, DDG, Bing, etc on behalf of the user (behind the scenes). The ads will be shown to the AI which will ignore them.
147.
▲
by
riskable
1y ago
WTF is going to happen to Google's ad revenue if every PC has an AI that can perform searches on the user's behalf?
148.
▲
by
riskable
1y ago
We're finally going to find out if he gives a shirt!
149.
▲
by
riskable
1y ago
In the 19th century, industrial magnates and politicians would pay for "press cuttings" or clipping services that summarized the news of the day for them. Even today, wealthy individuals will pay secretaries and assistants to do
150.
▲
by
riskable
1y ago
DRM is irrelevant. That's only if you want to efficiently extract the text. If you point a camera at an ebook reader with a little motor to tap the screen, "next" that's still easier than scanning physical books. The r
More ›