Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rising-sky
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
271.
▲
Scientists are about to change what a kilogram means
(washingtonpost.com)
2 points
by
rising-sky
9y ago
|
0 comments
272.
▲
Ember Redux now with TypeScript support
(ember-redux.com)
1 points
by
rising-sky
9y ago
|
0 comments
273.
▲
by
rising-sky
9y ago
Just because someone is "really smart" does not give them license to be "really dumb" when it comes to enabling an inclusive culture, in a company where they have the responsibility of being it's CEO: vis-a-viz, bei
274.
▲
Google’s AI Invents Sounds Humans Have Never Heard Before
(wired.com)
56 points
by
rising-sky
9y ago
|
17 comments
275.
▲
SF rent prices are unsustainable
(cnbc.com)
4 points
by
rising-sky
10y ago
|
0 comments
276.
▲
by
rising-sky
10y ago
"The strongest chain will break at it's weakest point". If I as a user, believe that a sequence of actions, from my keystrokes to voice input, which I perceive to be a direct interaction with a secure app are in fact insecure
277.
▲
by
rising-sky
10y ago
Well they actually weren't able to do this so accurately without disrupting service it seems. At least I think in my case, and it's part of the reason why I don't use Uber today: I had an Uber account for a couple months prio
278.
▲
by
rising-sky
10y ago
You actually have to accept the endorsement before it shows up on your profile, if you accept noise, I don't think you can complain that your profile is noisy.
279.
▲
by
rising-sky
10y ago
Actually, LinkedIn endorsements have to be accepted by the endorsee before appearing on their profile. This has always been the case, I know because I haven't accepted endorsements for `Cascading Stylesheets`, but for `CSS`.
280.
▲
by
rising-sky
10y ago
A standard doesn't `prevent` you from doing anything, it just says this is the accepted criterion, gauge or yardstick of implementing something and by which that implementation will be judged. It can be established by an authority or c
281.
▲
by
rising-sky
10y ago
It's doubtful he wanted to sell it, if the information was of any value, rhetorical, considering the NSA is up in arms about it, then he wouldn't have had trouble finding a willing and able buyer in all of those 20 years. *edited
282.
▲
by
rising-sky
10y ago
No, they are legally required to or could potentially be sued by investors for misleading