risho

7 ms·

31.
by risho 6y ago
it seems ironic to me that the people who are complaining about others being offended are usually the people who are most offended.
32.
by risho 6y ago
are keyboard layouts like a time sensitive matter? qwerty is from the 1800's and dvorak is from the 30's. By comparison this article came out yesterday.
33.
by risho 6y ago
I actually agreee. The conclusion I came to at the end of it was that learning a new keyboard layout was basically a waste of time for most people for a number of reasons. First of all there's no actual science that proves it's er
34.
by risho 6y ago
>Learning a new layout takes months of training. This is completely false. If you go cold turkey and actually work at it you can actually memorize a keyboard layout in a single afternoon, though you will be slow as hell. If you keep at i
35.
by risho 6y ago
I think that Pop has a bit of a branding issue. It has the reputation of an os with training wheels for newbies and gamer bros, but it is actually an all around great OS for anyone. It's a great gnome experience out of the box with all
36.
by risho 6y ago
It is worth noting you can basically get all of the benefit of using ubuntu(a good gnome experience, ppa's, etc) but without any of the snap stuff by installing pop os. It's a bit unfortunate that pop os is branded as something ba
37.
by risho 6y ago
just because something exists in some form today and is decentralized doesn't mean it will stand the test of time. the internet is a graveyard of abandoned and failed projects and protocols.
38.
by risho 7y ago
its still quite expensive though. it's great if you are looking to play the older formats. getting into legacy for 500 dollars is really nice. that said it's hard to justify buying into standard or pioneer on there. the prices are
39.
by risho 7y ago
you should look into btc-e, the russian exchange that was shut down by the united states government. not only was it a russian exchange, he was arrested in greece, neither of which are america, for those not keeping track at home. i agree i
40.
by risho 7y ago
decentralized, permissionless blockchains don't care about borders. centralized businesses absolutely do. Thinking that they can skirt securities law by saying "blah blah blockchain" is comically stupid. even calling centrali
41.
by risho 7y ago
this was obviously going to happen. how telegram could have imagined this going any other way is beyond me. i'm not even a lawyer and i could have told them this.
42.
by risho 7y ago
you can start watching immediately as it is downloading and it has a player built in, whereas the traditional torrent client needs to finish the video first and you need a separate video player.
43.
by risho 7y ago
Kinda sad to not see Joanna Rutkowska in the article or in the comments anywhere. She's contributed a lot to computer science generally, but the biggest thing is probably her work on qubes os, which is an awesome project. https:/
44.
by risho 7y ago
There are a number of things it offers. Being able to play high end triple A games on a chromebook or a cheap computer would be a huge boon. Not everyone wants to(or has the means to) spend 1300+ dollars on a gaming computer. Also there is
45.
by risho 9y ago
I saw this, realized I had never heard of it, and knew right away it had to be a blockchain. It all falls into place. Moving on.
46.
by risho 9y ago
can usb-c support multiple monitors + keyboard + other peripherals? can it support running an egpu?