riquito

75 ms·

721.
by riquito 13y ago
On Firefox linux, both 21 and aurora, their "Start now" example doesn't work: when I zoom all the tiles requests end up in "400 bad request". Chromium works. Not really satisfying
722.
by riquito 13y ago
It's a fair question, I'm ashamed by the snarky answers. If Google can't oppose the NSA in installing backdoors (by the way, this has to be demonstrated), DuckDuckGo can't oppose them neither. Best luck to the team of Du
723.
by riquito 13y ago
Nemo.
724.
by riquito 13y ago
> I complained about GNOME 3 since day one Maybe you need an attitude change
725.
by riquito 13y ago
So a person that simply want to learn something for the sake of knowledge is not the target of a teacher?
726.
by riquito 13y ago
AES is a specification of the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). USA use it to encrypt the most sensitive informations. It's hard to think that they would use a broken cryptographyc algorithm themselves
727.
by riquito 13y ago
All the computers in the world wouldn't be able to brute force AES with a strong key in less than 10 quadrillion years [1]. They would be better off spending millions in four-leaf clovers and faceroll the password. That said if they kn
728.
by riquito 13y ago
>> 4. Review my browser use > Sure. Use Chrome + best practices. If you care about your privacy your best bet is Firefox, not Chrome
729.
by riquito 13y ago
I have an hard time with the colors. input-warning(color = yellow) Yellow on yellow on my monitor is pretty much impossible to read. input-success(color = green) is better but I need to concentrate to read the letters simple-button are more
730.
by riquito 13y ago
If you buy expensive taxable objects like houses/cars you can't afford to keep them and you must get rid of them quickly, probably at less then they're worth
731.
by riquito 13y ago
I don't think we should consider the "good enough" case when security is involved. (some) password vaults are secure and yet have a straightforward interface.
732.
by riquito 13y ago
You may be amazed, confused, euphoric, skeptical, doubtful, intrigued...
733.
by riquito 13y ago
Worry not, it renders horribly on Linux too (the fonts for sure) (or maybe our taste and the author's are very different)
734.
by riquito 13y ago
What operative system are you using? On GNU/Linux - http / https are visible in the url bar - tabs are under the url bar (and under any other bar you activated) - menu is still there - status bar can be toggled on/off
735.
by riquito 13y ago
Since when a noun pronounce should be obvious?
736.
by riquito 14y ago
doesn't a patent imply that you must let other people use your idea in exchange of a fair price?
737.
by riquito 14y ago
And we (italian) speak about the city of Troy without any shame because has a completely different meaning, so I don't see any problem in speaking about Trojita at work (which is also a nonexistent word in italian, opposite to the translati
738.
by riquito 14y ago
"sign in with persona" may be confusing now but "sign in with your e-mail" it's pretty clear https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/persona/branding
739.
by riquito 14y ago
Blue or grey may be better suited to you? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/persona/branding
740.
by riquito 14y ago
And you may skip verbose too: `tar xf`
741.
by riquito 14y ago
nice analogy
742.
by riquito 14y ago
Both of the api are still available. Translate is the same as before but you must pay for it, google web search has been replaced by google custom search and you must pay for it. His point is that things must never change?
743.
by riquito 14y ago
"the most popular desktop app development language" on MS Windows only, where GNOME doesn't run
744.
by riquito 14y ago
It's a good approach because it doesn't filter out grammatically correct e-mails while blocking the blatantly false. About the invalid cases, who cares? It's not a problem, you must send an e-mail to check for correctness either way: your u
745.
by riquito 14y ago
Where is the math? Really, what's the point of making assumptions on the whole subject and invent a conclusion? You may be right, but you need facts to prove a point (which here is "go is as easy or easier than Python, faster, use less memo
746.
by riquito 14y ago
Don't you have any shame?
747.
by riquito 14y ago
You made an example of how not to write documentation and then you shown that the code was better without. That is not the point. Try to add content to the documentation, as "what is expected to be x?", then you can't remove it so easily an
748.
by riquito 14y ago
You can check yourself if a value is NaN // NaN typeof is ... number typeof value === 'number' && value != value btw, the original isNaN() doesn't check if a value is NaN, it checks if a value is coercible to a number