rimantas

66 ms·

661.
by rimantas 11y ago
For any use in production. Yes, you are right all that must be considered. Still not acceptable.
662.
by rimantas 11y ago
Yeah, I should have written 5-8 times, but MiniHack has some problem with editing comments.
663.
by rimantas 11y ago
Acceptable for use in production.
664.
by rimantas 11y ago
Ouch. That's about 8x the size I'd consider acceptable.
665.
by rimantas 11y ago
How about SmartGit? Back in the days when I was working on Windows and Linux I used SmartSVN, quite nice for a Java app.
666.
by rimantas 11y ago
Or maybe, just maybe, they are very aware of their user base and that's the reason there is no version for Linux? Should I get upset that they don't have Lithuanian version of the app, and hence demonstrate a lack of concern/
667.
by rimantas 11y ago
Nope, intolerance is the one thing that cannot be tolertated. Karl Popper: "Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to
668.
by rimantas 11y ago
Because human body is something to be ashamed of, or something like that.
669.
by rimantas 11y ago
Unlike Facetime nobody rised patent issues regarding Swift.
670.
by rimantas 11y ago
Not everybody is the same. Caffeine has zero effect on my sleep: I often drink a cup of coffee before going to bed. Or have a can of Red Bull (I drink it for the taste, not for some energising properties which have no effect on me).
671.
by rimantas 11y ago
Oh, React, the newest silver bullet.
672.
by rimantas 11y ago
CSS is about presentation, not semantics, that's the point of it. And the whole point of separation of concerns. So sad to see stuff like http://csszengarden.com/ being forgotten and the whole web standards movement co
673.
by rimantas 11y ago
If anything is worse than tables for layout it is inline CSS for styling.
674.
by rimantas 11y ago
I doubt you understand what the word "semantically" means. I don't see how polluting markup with <table> (and tables were often nested), <tr> and <td> is any better, not to mention that often already existi
675.
by rimantas 11y ago
> saw how Apple censors GPL software from App Store GPL censors GPL software from App Store.
676.
by rimantas 11y ago
Apple does release products, you might want to check the definition of the patent troll.
677.
by rimantas 11y ago
Being offended by words is no sign of professionalism.
678.
by rimantas 11y ago
> It's entirely possible to write an offline-capable web app. Yeah. It is entirely possible to make web app do a lot of things. Even do them cross-platform. Even to get almost native feel. But when you are done doing it you
679.
by rimantas 11y ago
The web ten years ago was indeed different when clean markup, separation of concerns, accessibility meant something. Nowadays it is just a mess, cannon fodder in the battle nobody asked for.
680.
by rimantas 11y ago
Once again, what so special about mobile? Somehow I don't see webtech proponents rallying for wining the desktop or winning the smartwatches. This obsession with winning the mobile is plain stupid. Instead of wasting time implementing
681.
by rimantas 11y ago
Funnily, iOS offers much better accessibility support than web. And I'd argue that many more apps use it (also Apple recently promoted apps with good accessibility support) compared to modern "web apps".
682.
by rimantas 11y ago
Imagine that you and your friend are hiking together. After a while your friend says: you know what, I think we are going in the wrong direction. You tell him something similar to your comment. And yes, he waits. And while he waits you get
683.
by rimantas 11y ago
Exatly. I'd like to know what percentage of photos ever taken and stored never get a second look.
684.
by rimantas 11y ago
Being called "{Apple product there} killer" never turned out to be good for the "killer" involved.
685.
by rimantas 11y ago
And coal power plants spread more radioactive material than nuclear ones.
686.
by rimantas 11y ago
I'd argue that Apple has done more positive and socially responsible thing than many other big (and small) companies. And generally people buy Apple products because they are great products. You can only fool once with advertising, how
687.
by rimantas 11y ago
Was Apple ever a monopoly? And just being a monopoly is not illegal.
688.
by rimantas 11y ago
With attitude like this we'd never have neither stadiums nor jet fighters.
689.
by rimantas 11y ago
Well, the nearest star is the Sun, so…
690.
by rimantas 11y ago
For me the best explanation is the size of the Universe. No other assumptions needed.

More ›