rimantas

28 ms·

271.
by rimantas 10y ago
Ah, that universal excuse: we are to big and too diverse. Drop the "U" then, maybe?
272.
by rimantas 10y ago
Interesting that you claim that OS X is not better when you are not even sure about the name…
273.
by rimantas 10y ago
I just miss http://csszengarden.com/ time.
274.
by rimantas 10y ago
You know, this sounds like a story about the soldier who made the soup from the axe. Maybe after all these wrappers and decorators you could drop react too and do just fine without it?
275.
by rimantas 10y ago
No mention of scrum, agile and pair programming either. Strange, huh? I'd say *DD is nice-to-have but orthogonal to being proficient. Or sometimes just counter-productive, if all it is is cargo-culting with zero understanding.
276.
by rimantas 10y ago
How many years would it take to master one topic? Say to the top X percent. How many of these intervals fit in 40 years career? Worth keeping in mind, that if we are talking technology there usually overlap between fields so you are unlikel
277.
by rimantas 10y ago
Most STEM people should know, that analytical ability relies a lot on knowledge. You cannot analyse how something is made up unless you are able to recognise parts, their relationships and dependences. You need those chunks, patterns in you
278.
by rimantas 10y ago
I strongly recommend it for everyone. Especially for those workaholics and one-(brain)-hemishpere individuals who think that knowing only one narrow area is OK.
279.
by rimantas 10y ago
Being expert means having ability to recognise certain patterns and having skills to apply then. So yes details don't matter much if pattern recognition works fine (and it's ability to work is in some degree dependant on ignoring
280.
by rimantas 10y ago
That's a poisonous chalice not the holy grail. How can someone to prefer JS to Swift is beyond my comprehension. Or is that "if the only tool you have is a hammer" situation?
281.
by rimantas 10y ago
Or just goes away.
282.
by rimantas 10y ago
Good luck. Hopefully you will disciver that there are things more important than mindless "innovation".
283.
by rimantas 10y ago
Omg, people go and find out how agriculture works if you only have that primitive view of it. Field, truck, my mouth… my ass.
284.
by rimantas 10y ago
No, that's just the very bad problem. Normaly we'd use several different words to describe various amount of hay. This is problem is on par with "have you already stopped to beat your wife?" Pseudo-intelectualism is jus
285.
by rimantas 10y ago
You do some study yourself. Will educate your and save us from reading your nonsense.
286.
by rimantas 10y ago
I think the first thing to do would be to start differentiate between science and vocational training again. Otherwise we will be looking at studies how astrophysics degree has little advantage over 2 years of apprenticeship in telescope bu
287.
by rimantas 10y ago
> It evolves at a fast pace. It REvolves at a fast pace. In place.
288.
by rimantas 10y ago
It's funny how future is described by many with what's hot that day. If you were to ask similar question ten years ago, the future would looks so wildly different (iPhone was announced in 2007).
289.
by rimantas 10y ago
Agreed. As I once put it web stack for the apps is like trying to invent, version after version, a kind of fork which is most suitable to eat soup. Folks, the spoon exists for the reason.
290.
by rimantas 10y ago
With react native and electron web stack is running in circles. How many times should this be repeated: web stack is easier to write only if you don't know shit of the native SDKs. Otherwise it does not even compare.
291.
by rimantas 10y ago
Omg, not java for sure. The important bits will be burried in the boilerplate code. How about starting with NO language at all. Learn what variables are, what assignment is, how do control structures work. And hey, you've just learned
292.
by rimantas 10y ago
That's exactly my point. Low barrier to entry allowed the web to explode.
293.
by rimantas 10y ago
Or one of the best. Switch wen browsers to strict processong and you will hardly find working web page.
294.
by rimantas 10y ago
I would. It does spoil everything.
295.
by rimantas 10y ago
> Myers-Briggs That's pseudoscience at its best.
296.
by rimantas 10y ago
Not sure aniut the low barrier to entry. Take 1000 programmers, how many can be made into decent plumbers in 6 months? Now take 1000 plumbers, how many can be made ibto decent programmers in 6 months? Also, I am nit aware how often tevhnolo
297.
by rimantas 10y ago
And as shown by OpenSSH being open source does not help much in the security department either.
298.
by rimantas 10y ago
Nobody mentioned http://www.wholeearthtelescope.org yet?
299.
by rimantas 10y ago
Harry Potter has better story and better lessons.
300.
by rimantas 10y ago
c) ignoring bullshit infographics.

More ›