rilita

16 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by rilita 12y ago

   If the people who wrote these emails don't approve of them being disseminated publicly, then I don't think people in the news should be doing so. Private / corporate email is not the same as government ( which should have hig
2. 122.▲
   by rilita 12y ago

   Yes to the degree that they know something about it. If the perpetrators are not in NK or working for them, then I don't see how NK gov. could prove they didn't do it. That is, the best NK could do to prove they aren't to bla
3. 123.▲
   by rilita 12y ago

   They are split up into categorical sections of what data was released and/or each release serves a purpose ( a pst mail dump ) They are all compressed using rar files. Rar releases are trademark of scene releases. This was done by prof
4. 124.▲
   by rilita 12y ago

   I agree with you in the sense that it could be NK due to the fact that it was clearly a well funded operation. Also, my final point is rather weak and ignores the possibility that NK wanted to do it and wants to be able to deny they did it
5. 125.▲
   by rilita 12y ago

   I have known my fair share of sysadmins; none of them are capable of writing decently complex malware. Have you seen the way the releases are organized?
6. 126.▲
   by rilita 12y ago

   There is something big that was not pointed out in this article. Whoever did it got paid to do it. This is not a simple case of revenge of a nerd, nor is it a case of "your political movie is offensive." Someone hates Sony /