Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
riku_iki
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
121.
▲
by
riku_iki
10mo ago
Tensions in region started few months ago, so assets could be deployed already. Also, my bet Maduro will still endure multiple months from now.
122.
▲
by
riku_iki
10mo ago
will elements of arraypool still be tracked by GC with overhead?
123.
▲
by
riku_iki
10mo ago
> China doesn’t have the infrastructure or logistics to wage a far from home operation against a similar power country (let alone the USA). they can totally do asymmetrical actions: - deploy submarines which could attack offenders - rath
124.
▲
by
riku_iki
10mo ago
> Simple arenas are easy enough to write yourself you can write arena yourself, but it is useless if lang doesn't allow you to integrate it, e.g. allocate objects and vars on that arena..
125.
▲
by
riku_iki
10mo ago
My understanding is that that arena allows you to allocate memory segments, but you can't do much with it, you can't allocate var or object on it like in C++ for example, so its almost useless.
126.
▲
by
riku_iki
10mo ago
Rust may feel like this in general, but I seen multiple discussions when people spot cases where rust is much slower than C++, they start looking at them, and the finding is that Rust is not zero-cost abstraction, and induce penalty sometim
127.
▲
by
riku_iki
10mo ago
I don't understand this, once Arena is gone, all contained objects will be destroyed altogether, that's the idea of Arena, no need to move them to GC control.
128.
▲
by
riku_iki
10mo ago
Not sure about .NET, but Java doesn't have arenas..
129.
▲
by
riku_iki
10mo ago
I am not sure I understand moving GC concern. Arena content would not be controlled by GC, otherwise it defeats the purpose of Arena.
130.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
what about failover story if server dies? PG failover setup is complicated, and cloud infra handles this for you.
131.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> I somewhat disagree, specifically on the implicit claim that all GC has overhead and alternatives do not. all GC have overhead, but specific allocation pattern: allocators with arena has as minimum overhead as possible, and are orders
132.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> (1) I have never used an allocator myself, and (2) never seen anyone else use it. arena allocators are necessity for high performance software, because heap allocations are magnitude slower.
133.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
Rust is not zero cost abstractions, they make decision on case-by-case basis.
134.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
My recollection is that traditionally they used Ada for avionics, but per some internet claims they had difficulties to hire enough Ada programmers for such large projects, so switched to C++.
135.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
what would be so obviously better choice of language in your opinion?
136.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
Post starts with wrong statement right away: "The Transformer architecture revolutionized sequence modeling with its introduction of attention" Attention was developed before transformers.
137.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> Amazing, every single dollar goes to care! Not a single dollar to overhead! Where are these insurance companies' profit margins coming from? they kinda have it on chart but without overhead numbers: insurance collects 1T of paymen
138.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> The optimistic view is that Anthropic is one of about four labs in the world capable of generating truly state-of-the-art models. what about Chinese models?..
139.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
I am not a lawyer, but it is possible he can say whatever he wants without consequences to public because OAI is not a public company.
140.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> What do you think happens to all the enterprise OpenAI contracts at that point? they will go to google if it wins the AI race.
141.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> Altman says that OpenAI will top $20 billion in ARR this year, which certainly seems like significant revenue generation. [1] fixed this for you
142.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> Claiming that practically they aren't because no one runs them long enough defeats the very notion of a Turning machine in the first place. I think this is your own conclusion, which can't be strictly derived from citation. H
143.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> This isn't what Turing-completeness is. And by definition all practical computing is not a Turing Machine, simply because TMs require an infinite tape. I think you are too triggered and entitled in your nit-picking. Its obvious in
144.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
such high performance program indeed could potentially be superior, if it would exist (this area is very undeveloped, there is no existing distributed well established solution which could handle large domain) and math would be formalized i
145.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
but what is the share of PhD workforce who is doing novel and creative things compared to following some mechanical workflow?
146.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
its easily fixable, utility company can charge fee for fixed cost those who connected to the grid, and if all rich decided to disconnect, then they disconnect neighborhood eliminating fixed cost.
147.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> rich people just buying rooftop solar systems, which exacerbated the grid problems even more. how it exacerbated problems exactly?..
148.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
I work in math heavy applied setting. Randomly hired PhDs are also need to be supervised, end results being monitored, code be reviewed or they will make lots of mistakes, and my view is if you throw some problem like: build optimization mo
149.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
> Google+ was big how you define big? My understanding they failed to compete with facebook, and decided to redirect resources somewhere else.
150.
▲
by
riku_iki
11mo ago
chromecast is alive, podcast, music were migrated to youtube app, url shortener is not core business and just side hustle for google. Not familiar with g suite legacy.
More ›