richbell

56 ms·

781.
by richbell 4y ago
> I don't understand why the chain of custody matters if DKIM and DMARC are legitimate ways to verify the communications contained in the laptop. Whether the information is real is orthogonal to how it was obtained. Conspiring with
782.
by richbell 4y ago
The police can get precise information in a click of a button.
783.
by richbell 4y ago
License plates and cars are already tracked and that data, along with cell phone data, is sold to the highest bidder. Palantir, founded by Elon Musk's friend Peter Thiel, is in-part responsible for making wide-scale invasive surveillan
784.
by richbell 4y ago
> Which would make the identifier itself, and its real-time location, public information, but the knowledge of who owns the identifier would remain as private information. Yes and no. Tracking airplanes is something hobbyists have been d
785.
by richbell 4y ago
> Yeah I think you'd change your tune as well if some psychopath attacked your infant child. This is demonstrably false; last I checked, Elon didn't even file a police report. > Sweeney said he hasn't received any noti
786.
by richbell 4y ago
Elon Musk is the kid on the playground shouting "time-out" and inventing a new rule every time he's about to get tagged.
787.
by richbell 4y ago
> The computer store owner in the USA is not a foreign adversary. Sure, if you presuppose that the people responsible for disclosing it are credible and honest. I personally have some questions why a computer store owner would, faced wit
788.
by richbell 4y ago
I actually think it could be related. Elon claims that "lil X" was in the car, which could either be the rapper Lil Nas X or his son (with Grimes) X Æ A-Xii.
789.
by richbell 4y ago
If nothing else, this story (along with countless others) really affirms the value of full-disk encryption. A stranger should not be able to unplug your hard-drive and access your nudes.
790.
by richbell 4y ago
Indeed, though not necessarily mutually exclusive. I have personally seen the claim debunked on numerous platforms almost immediately after it was made, however, I concede that someone else may not have been exposed to that yet.
791.
by richbell 4y ago
> it doesn't seem plausible to me that the Bidens would not make that fact public It makes sense to me, considering how damaging and embarrassing the content was. If they confirm it, they lose plausible deniability in being able to
792.
by richbell 4y ago
> My mistake, I had forgotten about Rudy Giuliani's involvement. That's okay, I had to go back and re-check the details of the story multiple times. Based on your other comments, I think we're probably share a similar view
793.
by richbell 4y ago
https://mobile.twitter.com/justinemusk/status/15955060875703...
794.
by richbell 4y ago
> Donald J. Trump was not directly involved in the breaking of the laptop story. Do you really believe that Rudy Guiliani, a man acting as Trump's lackey for numerous things, received bombshell information and publicized it without
795.
by richbell 4y ago
It is disingenuous to call sharing publicly available information about an airplane's travel "realtime doxing".
796.
by richbell 4y ago
This is demonstrably false; Elon didn't even file a police report. > Sweeney said he hasn't received any notification of legal action, and the last time his bot tweeted anything was Dec. 12, "which is not last night, so I
797.
by richbell 4y ago
If you were attacked by someone and got a clear picture of their license plate, would you: a) report it to the police, who have direct access to vehicle registrations and can easily find the perpetrator or b) post on Twitter asking random p
798.
by richbell 4y ago
> Sweeney said he hasn't received any notification of legal action, and the last time his bot tweeted anything was Dec. 12, "which is not last night, so I don’t get how that’s connected.” https://www.nbcnews.com&#x2F
799.
by richbell 4y ago
> The story you linked is about a completely separate and unrelated story. WikiLeaks and Assange were not involved here. I am aware. My point is that there is a precedent for this behaviour and neither Trump nor Republicans are credible.
800.
by richbell 4y ago
> Every single one of these claims is false You're right, Rudy Giuliani is clearly a credible figure and his account of how he happened to come across Hunter Biden's laptop is sensible and not-suspicous in the least. Hey, quick
801.
by richbell 4y ago
Elon did everything in his power to ruin the life of a whistle-blower. After they were able to identify the source of the leak, Martin Tripp, someone who had a personal vendetta against Tripp called in a false police report that he was pl
802.
by richbell 4y ago
> Oh, just like when pre-Musk Twitter banned NY Post/journalists over a true story about Hunter Biden's laptop. I don't see how an anti-doxxing rule banning people tracking Elon Musk's whereabouts is worse. Calling it
803.
by richbell 4y ago
> Quick question: Is it legal to repeatedly follow a person for the purpose of harassing the person with implied threats of violence? An airplane is not a person.
804.
by richbell 4y ago
> Literally everything you're saying is wildly biased hyperbole or just outright unsubstantiated. I can't take this back and forth seriously if you're going to come it in such bad faith It's "wildly biased hyperb
805.
by richbell 4y ago
> Where's the equal or louder negative attention for billionaires who profit off death and destruction? That use actual slave labor for their projects that result in tens of thousands of deaths? That wreck the environment without co
806.
by richbell 4y ago
That's his preferred narrative. The truth is that Elon Musk has been subject to negative attention for years because of market manipulation[0], abhorrent labour practices and safety record[1], and obsession with inserting himself into
807.
by richbell 4y ago
> Hillary Clinton - Clinton Foundation = Good Barack Obama - Obama Foundation = Good > Bill Gates - Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation = Good > Mark Zuckerberg - Chan Zuckerberg Foundation = Good > Warren Buffet - Buffet Founda
808.
by richbell 4y ago
There is nothing wrong with posting publicly available flight data. Incidentally, Kiwi Farms did not get banned from the Internet.
809.
by richbell 4y ago
Perhaps V will be suitable for writing production systems one day. Until then, it doesn't seem suitable for anything outside hobby development.
810.
by richbell 4y ago
How would NFTs have solved someone copying your work? For the sake of argument, let's say that Zhang also created an NFT of her photo. What's to stop Dieschburg from right-clicking it and publishing his own "NFT" of that

More ›