rhizome

10 ms·

91.
by rhizome 5y ago
Of course people want security, how can you say otherwise? What you seem to be talking around is that security researchers have been unable to figure out simpler forms of maintaining a true sense of security, simpler forms of reliability. T
92.
by rhizome 5y ago
"Call Google. Ask for Sundar."
93.
by rhizome 5y ago
I never take restaurant phone numbers directly off of Google, I always check their (hopefully existent) website before calling, or at least crosscheck it against other sources. There is no way Grubhub or any of the other mediating greedhole
94.
by rhizome 5y ago
And certainly people are capable of implementing algo-based clients. Heck, have them scrape your personal web and email and whatever activity, keeping it all local.
95.
by rhizome 5y ago
Most, as far as I'm aware, since it's not required to do the work in almost all cases.
96.
by rhizome 5y ago
It's not a court ruling, it's a regulatory order. Here's some detail Apple didn't include: https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/28/22999998/apple-bigger-fin... And no, not all oversight sh
97.
by rhizome 5y ago
what better way to ensure you get CS degreed ppl for positions that legally can't require one than to reproduce the "group project" model as an organizational principle?
98.
by rhizome 5y ago
I simply don't think the number of installs is a compelling piece of information, not the least because it is gamed everywhere. To me it says one of two things: "someone installed it," or "developer spun up a zillion mic
99.
by rhizome 5y ago
Bait and switch.
100.
by rhizome 5y ago
"As we have previously said, we disagree with the ACM’s original order and are appealing it." Oh nothing, just some company interfering with a nation's democratically enabled oversight and consumer protection laws and polic
101.
by rhizome 5y ago
I'm not going to die on this hill, but that seems like a lot of complexity for a company with in-house skills, maybe even the worst of both (in-house vs cloud/managed) worlds.
102.
by rhizome 5y ago
> I'm wondering if I'm unnecessarily conservative or other people are underestimating maintenance costs. Check out some of the HN posts where people talk about how much companies spend on AWS and calculate how many sysadmin&#x
103.
by rhizome 5y ago
Not wanting to "add friction" means you're making it easy for bots, it's as simple as that. Bots don't have bank accounts and the people running bots don't want to be identified via bank information or using up
104.
by rhizome 5y ago
It's probably worth it, given the alternative. Depends on the people making the decisions, though.
105.
by rhizome 5y ago
It's still a separate problem.
106.
by rhizome 5y ago
Not <$1. $5.
107.
by rhizome 5y ago
> I hate, hate, hate the way corps try to brush away any unpleasantness like ignoring it means it didn't happen! Remember that study that found psychopathic traits in upper management? https://www.forbes.com/sites&#
108.
by rhizome 5y ago
Just to leave a stake in the sand here for future reference, I'm sure they will introduce subscriber-only content at some point.
109.
by rhizome 5y ago
That's a separate problem. The topic is about running a site that crawls up your browser's ass as far as possible.
110.
by rhizome 5y ago
So? Make them use those card#s, a limited asset, and put the banks to work protecting those interests instead of leaving all the load for us.
111.
by rhizome 5y ago
So what if there are echo chambers? Do you deride them as much when they're called "best practices" in business, management, programming, HR, etc.? Unless the exception suddenly proves the rule, much of our lives is shaped by
112.
by rhizome 5y ago
I'm under the impression that there's one thing that works almost 100%: nominal payment for account creation. A few bucks. Or more, if you also want it to help run the site. Bonus for the latter case is that you're also helpi
113.
by rhizome 5y ago
Will they sell you static IPs?
114.
by rhizome 5y ago
To be sure, it's not getting it serviced "somewhere," it's getting it serviced at the dealership.
115.
by rhizome 5y ago
Blocked because their advertising providers don't understand GDPR.
116.
by rhizome 5y ago
As a many-tabs saver and reloader, chapeau to you. Good luck, I'm pulling for you!
117.
by rhizome 5y ago
I feel you, but the browser-cache train left the station years ago. :/
118.
by rhizome 5y ago
I think it is a stretch. What basis would someone use, who knew enough to disclose immediately, to bet their freedom that it was being exploited by others such that they could exploit it without their initial disclosure providing probable
119.
by rhizome 5y ago
Is this to say you want zero page-loading of existing tabs on startup (if in fact you save your tabs across restarts)?
120.
by rhizome 5y ago
Great! Have a "play next automatically" toggle with an "always do this" checkbox.

More ›