rhabarba

53 ms·

631.
by rhabarba 10y ago
Still waiting for Guile Emacs.
632.
by rhabarba 10y ago
When has development degraded to "just use a framework"?
633.
by rhabarba 10y ago
Multiple (!) security issues in OpenBSD (!). OK. We're doomed.
634.
by rhabarba 10y ago
Wouldn't it make more sense for them to use joe then? joe comes with preconfigured hotkeys which are more "known" than C-o etc.
635.
by rhabarba 10y ago
^ Thanks for that trick, I didn't follow ST development too much recently.
636.
by rhabarba 10y ago
vi doesn't kill my newlines when on PuTTY.
637.
by rhabarba 10y ago
Probably I'm just the wrong type of person for nano then. I'm rather happy with Emacs (even with its mediocre performance).
638.
by rhabarba 10y ago
I never understood why nano is so popular. It even breaks line breaks by default.
639.
by rhabarba 10y ago
Empty page on my Android.
640.
by rhabarba 10y ago
Today I learned that /usr actually means user, not Unified System Resources. Damn, one less thing I can nitpick about.
641.
by rhabarba 11y ago
Because lol, standards.
642.
by rhabarba 11y ago
There is also a native Vim, compiled with Visual Studio: http://tuxproject.de/projects/vim
643.
by rhabarba 11y ago
By the way, for those who are curious: there already have been native (non-msys) Windows versions of Vim, ls etc. for years.
644.
by rhabarba 11y ago
Really? Does Ubuntu come without proprietary drivers now?
645.
by rhabarba 11y ago
As a Windows and BSD user, I completely switched to the superior ksh.
646.
by rhabarba 11y ago
As a dev, I don't use the screwed up bash on any system I work on. It just doesn't work.
647.
by rhabarba 11y ago
It's been a couple of years since Microsoft stopped developing their Xenix UNIX system and sold it to SCO so they could concentrate on OS/2 and DOS. It's been some years less since Microsoft started providing Unix command-lin
648.
by rhabarba 11y ago
A new week, a new git security fuckup.
649.
by rhabarba 11y ago
Sorry for not quoting properly. I'll do better next time. :-)
650.
by rhabarba 11y ago
Does your runtime still barf JVM stack traces?
651.
by rhabarba 11y ago
How many Linux issues are required before people stop using Linux?
652.
by rhabarba 11y ago
Depends. Here's the full story: http://pastebin.com/gKqTcH4j
653.
Help the Moldovan company RITLabs to survive(pastebin.com)
150 points by rhabarba 11y ago|24 comments
654.
by rhabarba 11y ago
OpenBSD's leadership focuses on clean and correct code, not necessarily on security. Of course, that leads to security though.
655.
by rhabarba 11y ago
A browser is not a decent platform for anything.
656.
by rhabarba 11y ago
What's wrong with Common Lisp? Caveman2 is great.
657.
Ask HN: Switching from WordPress To? (Static Site Generator Required)
2 points by rhabarba 11y ago|0 comments
658.
by rhabarba 11y ago
One more take for ad blockers actually improving the Web.
659.
by rhabarba 11y ago
Does it support GnuPG?
660.
by rhabarba 11y ago
Leaving the horrible security of the Java Runtime aside, I highly doubt that there is such a thing like "insecure programming languages". There is "insecure programming" though.

More ›