rhabarba

25 ms·

301.
by rhabarba 6y ago
> Self hostable, open source, password manager for teams One of my teams shares passwords as well. We use KeePass over WebDAV. Works for us. I fail to see the market niche here.
302.
Dotfiles: Stop the Madness (2012)(pub.gajendra.net)
2 points by rhabarba 6y ago|0 comments
303.
by rhabarba 6y ago
There was no attack. Someone read the protocol specs and used them within the allowed borders of said protocol specs to tell the protocol to generate some revenue for them. End of story.
304.
by rhabarba 6y ago
How fitting: One of the most over-engineered desktop environments moves from one obscure hosting facility for the most unnecessarily complicated version control system to another.
305.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Must be a Perl thing - even Epsilon’s website is a cgi one.
306.
by rhabarba 6y ago
I stand corrected: It seems to have both versions included. Still, 250 US$ seem to be obscene.
307.
by rhabarba 6y ago
> where it is available everywhere by default It is not (anymore), so not even that is clear.
308.
by rhabarba 6y ago
I understand that it’s not a solution for my BSD servers then. Thank you though, I didn’t know about that and I might try it later.
309.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Which operating systems are possible on the remote end?
310.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Yes: TRAMP can be a bit slow, but it is very portable.
311.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Even in CUA-mode, Emacs is very unusual in quite a lot of ways in the DOS world. That’s why, I guess.
312.
by rhabarba 6y ago
It still feels rather different than (e.g.) TSE. Don’t misunderstand me, I surely like Emacs and I use it regularly, but the command-line version is a strange thing in a DOS environment.
313.
by rhabarba 6y ago
I had micro as my default text editor on Windows for a while, but it felt like a nano port to me. Not sure why.
314.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Borland surely had many editors, it seems.
315.
by rhabarba 6y ago
For many people, Vim’s learning curve does not justify its features. Line editors are not for everyone.
316.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Epsilon seems to be a GUI editor?
317.
by rhabarba 6y ago
I’m not sure whether a JavaScript-based terminal is a good idea.
318.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Joe actually has a Windows build - right from their website. https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io By the way, there is a free semi-GUI WordStar clone named WordTsar.
319.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Does it have a Windows version?
320.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Some of FAR’s best features only work inside ConEmu though. (I think that hasn’t changed in a while.)
321.
by rhabarba 6y ago
EDIT was dropped with 64-bit.
322.
by rhabarba 6y ago
KEDIT, the XEDIT clone? There is a free version of that, The Hessling Editor.
323.
by rhabarba 6y ago
The article talks about it, including modern(ish) clones like K.
324.
by rhabarba 6y ago
It does indeed! Sad that it doesn’t support UTF-8.
325.
by rhabarba 6y ago
I find the Windows Terminal much inferior to ConEmu. Anyway, text editors specifically written for DOS environments integrate rather well with the „classic Windows console“.
326.
by rhabarba 6y ago
GRIEF is an open-source BRIEF clone, it can probably do that. (The article made me try it. I found and reported a few macOS problems, but the Windows version seems to be functional. I might keep it.)
327.
by rhabarba 6y ago
I am quite happy with (Acme and) GNU Emacs as my GUI editors, but Emacs is really annoying to use on a console to me, especially on non-native platforms like Windows. One of the reasons why I like the article.
328.
by rhabarba 6y ago
The author implies that vi/Vim and an Emacs are the usual suspects here, but they’re rather foreign on Windows and DOS-like environments - which is true. Other editors in the list are - at least, UI/UX-wise - much more common to D
329.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Why would you do that as there’s a native micro for Windows? (I, personally, find micro too nano’ish. YMMV.)
330.
by rhabarba 6y ago
Ctrl+Z would work, or F6.

More ›