rglover

68 ms·

871.
by rglover 2y ago
Classic NPD behavior from the sound of it (triangulating board members, lying/withholding, etc). Wouldn't be surprised if the return was predicated by promises to do/be better or extreme gaslighting. Worth people studying the
872.
by rglover 2y ago
If Google just removed all the junk and went back to their old school algos, all of their problems and their users problems would be resolved. It never ceases to amaze me the lengths some people go to introduce complexity. If they were trul
873.
by rglover 2y ago
Yes, now that it's public knowledge. Had this not been leaked, that wouldn't have been an option.
874.
Avoiding the Sunk Cost Bias Trap as a Programmer(cheatcode.co)
1 points by rglover 2y ago|0 comments
875.
by rglover 2y ago
FWIW, I failed a few of these and built an entire full-stack JS framework (CLI, front-end, and back-end) [1]. Does this stuff come up? Yes. But knowing the answers to trivia that only seldom come up is a terrible way to evaluate talent. [1]
876.
by rglover 2y ago
Sorry to hear this. RIP. “Be guided by beauty. I really mean that. Pretty much everything I’ve done has had an aesthetic component, at least to me. Now you might think ‘well, building a company that’s trading bonds, what’s so aesthetic abou
877.
by rglover 2y ago
That was a genius ad...what's all the fuss about?
878.
SAUCR License – Source Available Under Commercial Restriction(saucr.org)
2 points by rglover 2y ago|0 comments
879.
by rglover 2y ago
It's a stretch to call it a legal document (technically, yes, but it's written so that anyone can understand it). I wrote it myself in plain english [1]. [1] https://saucr.org/example
880.
by rglover 2y ago
Assuming the project/tool was interesting and that was a concern, why not just forward it to your legal department (or manager) to get clarification on if it's an option?
881.
by rglover 2y ago
The license is pretty straightforward and fills in the gaps where the others fail to protect OSS creators (leading to headaches like w/ Redis). Perhaps it's too idealistic to think people will just read it and see if it matches th
882.
by rglover 2y ago
Thanks for the feedback/tips, I'll give it a shot.
883.
by rglover 2y ago
I built a full-stack JS framework [1] that I thought would be a hit. As best as I can tell, because it lacks the complexity/word salad of existing solutions, it's mostly been ignored despite being (imo) an elegant solution to a lo
884.
by rglover 3y ago
SEEKING WORK, Tennessee, US, Remote Preferred I'm a full-stack, JavaScript/Node.js developer and UI designer. I'm the creator of the Joystick JavaScript framework [1], Push deployment service [2], and Mod CSS framework [3]. I
885.
by rglover 3y ago
> the issue is that they also want the benefit of not being ignored So in order to get any interest in your project, you have to be open source (and align with the ideology absolutely)?
886.
by rglover 3y ago
> I think there's a real grievance to be had by projects that were formerly open source, solicited contributions from non-paid volunteers, and then change licensing models. I think that's the crux of the frustration and fair. B
887.
Open Source Is Not About You (2018)(gist.github.com)
1 points by rglover 3y ago|0 comments
888.
by rglover 3y ago
> You should be on board if you want Open Source to win against proprietary software. But those companies are still doing what is, essentially, proprietary software: like the proprietary software companies of the 80s, they very much cons
889.
by rglover 3y ago
Apparatchik pretext setting.
890.
by rglover 3y ago
Semi-related: often astounded by what can be achieved with HTML5 canvas.
891.
GPTBot: OpenAI's Web Crawler(medium.com)
2 points by rglover 3y ago|0 comments
892.
by rglover 3y ago
> The influx of AI-generated code, an ever-evolving threat landscape, and the push for shorter release cycles can jeopardize code quality. All of these factors dictate the need for continuous and accurate code analysis to help developmen
893.
by rglover 3y ago
HTML in email shouldn't be as big of a nightmare as it is. It really comes down to rendering engines. If all email clients just checked for text vs HTML and when HTML switched the rendering engine to Webkit, this problem could be solve
894.
by rglover 3y ago
This is something I've been thinking a lot about (a way to set context for an LLM against my own code), thank you for putting this out. Looks really polished.
895.
by rglover 3y ago
SEEKING WORK, Tennessee, United States Remote: Yes I'm a full-stack, JavaScript/Node.js developer and designer. I'm the creator of the Joystick JavaScript framework [1], Push deployment service [2], and Mod CSS framework [3].
896.
by rglover 3y ago
Hey folks, author of Joystick here. A quick FAQ if you're curious: > Another framework, seriously? Yes. If you dig it, use it. If you don't, that’s cool, too. > Why would I use this and not React/Vue/Svelte/et
897.
Show HN: Joystick – A Full-Stack JavaScript Framework(cheatcode.co)
2 points by rglover 3y ago|1 comments
898.
by rglover 3y ago
Joystick: https://cheatcode.co/joystick .
899.
by rglover 3y ago
> Missing out on relational features: With MongoDB, we lost out on many nice features from the relational world like CASCADE which, when specified, deletes all referenced resources across other tables whenever a target resource is delete
900.
by rglover 3y ago
A complete web development stack. A combination of a full-stack JavaScript framework [1], a deployment service [2], and a CSS framework [3]. All designed to work together and remain stable long-term so you're not chasing the typical ru

More ›