rfrank

45 ms·

391.
by rfrank 11y ago
How is a "sharing" economy, or the vast majority of startups, helping anyone but stakeholders? Without citing a particular piece of content it's hard to say anyone's lying, just being way too dramatic for more clicks. Be
392.
by rfrank 11y ago
Do you feel the same way about software devs who work for food delivery/laundry service startups and the like? Writing clickbait is no better or worse than "changing the world" one delivery at a time. Everyone's just cha
393.
by rfrank 11y ago
never really used reader when it was still alive. been using feedly for 6 months or so now and like it a lot, though.
394.
by rfrank 11y ago
google spiders
395.
by rfrank 11y ago
lol. just like google+ v1 was a facebook killer? ;)
396.
by rfrank 11y ago
> we're moving into a post-privacy world We will never live in a post privacy world. I'm so fucking sick of seeing people say garbage like that.
397.
by rfrank 11y ago
*content marketing.
398.
by rfrank 11y ago
That doesn't seem like a great incentive for a dev to work with Twitter's API until they figure that out...
399.
by rfrank 11y ago
astroturfffff
400.
by rfrank 11y ago
The majority of the nation just doesn't care about torture. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/12/15/th...
401.
by rfrank 11y ago
And not everyone wants neighbors who destroy their quality of life because of their perceptions of a "nanny state."
402.
by rfrank 11y ago
Calling Palantir evil strikes me as pretty fair.
403.
by rfrank 11y ago
The unethical behavior in question is robbery. End of story.
404.
by rfrank 11y ago
Chatanooga has that sweet gigabit fiber though.
405.
by rfrank 11y ago
almost certainly not.
406.
by rfrank 12y ago
Frustrating as well because supporters of the programs like to bring up how they've been challenged in court before so they're perfectly fine and legal. Well, not exactly...
407.
by rfrank 12y ago
And most responses are something along the lines of, "just move." Top notch problem solving, that right there.
408.
by rfrank 12y ago
What defines "trusted access?" One of the points of bitcoin / blockchain is not having to trust anyone involved.
409.
by rfrank 12y ago
> Cisco is probably feeling pretty nervous about this. Or the folks at Palantir and comparable companies that help enable mass surveillance of populations.
410.
by rfrank 12y ago
It may be worth considering putting the Goldstar menu on your site so users know what options are available to them. Could even include Leafly reviews so people can have a bit more info on what they're getting each month.
411.
by rfrank 12y ago
Why is this any better than just calling a delivery service that already exists? You get to maintain direct control over the strains you get that way as well. And you don't get any of the promotions from a physical dispensary. Ex. Magn
412.
by rfrank 12y ago
At least based on responses from /r/hiphopheads on reddit, anyone who even knows who the founders are think they're absolute jokes. They need a better act if they're pretending.
413.
by rfrank 12y ago
Nobody on SoundCloud is profiting from other people's copyright works as well, at least not through that service. To date there's no royalty or revenue sharing model for artists there. Should every DJ who's ever performed be
414.
5 Rules To Finding The Right Size Contract Manufacturer(blog.optimumdesign.com)
1 points by rfrank 13y ago|0 comments
415.
by rfrank 13y ago
7rr specifically was pretty easy to counter, just get cannons out when you scout the early roach warren. The program from that article was pretty fun though, used it to make some absolutely ridiculous blink builds that didn't really wo
416.
by rfrank 13y ago
Earlier in this thread someone said, "Once your data is in someone else's cloud, you have no recourse." As a more general matter, do you think that's the way it should be? Do you feel that your information no longer bein
417.
by rfrank 13y ago
Which will likely not happen for a number of reasons, see the current Bay Area fight over tech/gentrification.
418.
by rfrank 13y ago
That situation also means that the lowest wage workers have to commute the furthest, often (as the author of the article experiences) spending most of their daily pay just getting to and from work. "Move further from your job" is
419.
by rfrank 13y ago
They go back to having a print edition tomorrow, need a big story.