rfl890

10 ms·

91.
by rfl890 2y ago
I think that's the joke
92.
by rfl890 2y ago
Avoiding sh overcomplicates this. Just give them a one liner: mv ~/.zshrc ~/._zshrc and vice versa. Pasting a cmd is not rocket science.
93.
by rfl890 2y ago
Hehe... Hey Lois
94.
by rfl890 2y ago
You just gave me jamais vu.
95.
by rfl890 2y ago
Does this blog have heavy javascript? It's quite laggy for me.
96.
by rfl890 2y ago
No. More like a denial of service. The bot hosters do it out of pure hatred for TF2
97.
by rfl890 2y ago
Control Panel -> Add or remove programs -> Microsoft Windows -> (right click) -> Uninstall
98.
by rfl890 2y ago
Between the both of them, I would take the more "open" one.
99.
by rfl890 2y ago
It is?
100.
by rfl890 2y ago
Sexy.
101.
by rfl890 2y ago
I was on mobile and didn't want to type out all that. An example (dang usually posts comments like this on popular submissions): Related: Post title - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=XXXXXXXXX (date) | XX commen
102.
by rfl890 2y ago
It's worse formatted than dang's stuff, but ya tried
103.
by rfl890 2y ago
https://old.reddit.com ?
104.
by rfl890 2y ago
WD-40 is never financially recovering from this
105.
by rfl890 2y ago
What a spiteful comment over a little skepticism
106.
by rfl890 2y ago
Didn't mention anything about chances. If these companies wanted they could decrypt all traffic and it's easier than how you said (just swap out a web server binary or something). Although i must admit cloudflare has a worse track
107.
by rfl890 2y ago
The latter. For example, what is "tracked them” (going off memory here) even supposed to imply? Log the spammer email address and send it off whereever (which most mail services do), says the context. Just looks like a poor attempt to
108.
by rfl890 2y ago
> They are in a position to log and analyze all of the traffic they decrypt, including all of the plaintext POST data, all of the cookies, all of the origin IPs, L7 payload sizes, and traffic timestamps for over 35 million websites. And
109.
by rfl890 2y ago
Going by an estimate of 1tb total in imgs (1m x 1mb) it would cost $15 a month to chuck em on r2 and request charges are .36 per million so negligible for your usecase
110.
by rfl890 2y ago
I feel you. Modern minecraft updates feel immensely tone deaf
111.
by rfl890 2y ago
Citing an obvious satirical piece?
112.
by rfl890 2y ago
Most people who use this site would use the search bar, which reports errors, and those who directly type it in aren't exactly laypeople.
113.
by rfl890 2y ago
Quoting the repo: > The goal is to create clean, race-free userland utilities that are POSIX compliant, maximizing compatibility with existing shell scripts while minimizing bloat. > It is not a goal to be compatible with GNU utilitie
114.
by rfl890 2y ago
AFAIK metatables are still in Lua 5.4?
115.
by rfl890 2y ago
Serving a kilobytes static file over HTTPS at around ~1k rps shouldn't be too hard for a modern server in the year of our lord 2024 right?
116.
by rfl890 2y ago
https://www.wonkypedia.org/article/AES-512 Look at it spitting out garbage here.
117.
by rfl890 2y ago
Seems like we're adding colour to bits again.
118.
by rfl890 2y ago
Yep, HN is definitely not the article's target audience.
119.
by rfl890 3y ago
At runtime you could simply verify the dll‘s signature or any other generic code integrity solution? Why go to all the trouble to verify your implementation at runtime when you could do it at compile time?
120.
by rfl890 3y ago
The customer support gave me a good laugh. Thanks

More ›