rezonant

93 ms·

1411.
by rezonant 6y ago
Yeah not the end of the world if it doesn't land immediately, based on the original devs responding that they'd rather find the right place for it than the expedient place for it
1412.
by rezonant 6y ago
Yeah, I think MS should address this point. Airlie also asked if everything here is covered by Open Invention Network (OIN) of which Microsoft is a participant, and indeed I'm pretty sure it all has to be since that is the point of OIN
1413.
by rezonant 6y ago
My understanding is that this is meant to become transparent to the user, that really this is about enablement of hardware acceleration within WSL, and that the typical Linux userland graphics APIs like OpenGL would layer on top. So the goa
1414.
by rezonant 6y ago
I believe the purpose is for devs who are deploying to Linux, their toolchain may not fully work in Windows, but they want to have a similar dev/test env within Windows... pretty much the whole point of Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL
1415.
by rezonant 6y ago
This seems to be highly tied to the challenge of moving things around on a mobile phone (multi-touch device). While I do think there's benefits for accessibility in this sort of UI, I think most users would prefer if a multi-touch drag
1416.
by rezonant 6y ago
I do want to say that despite my comment here, seems like projects like Devuan, Void, and Arch are doing OK with this, in concert with projects like elogind and eudev etc that forego systemd while providing compatible replacements.
1417.
by rezonant 6y ago
Haha. Knowing little about the state of the BPF developments, the line that BPF will probably supercede everything literally broke my brain
1418.
by rezonant 6y ago
Agreed. I've finished the whole thing and although it is a bit rambly it is worth it for anyone who uses systemd on the daily. I realized I have deployed units that misunderstood these core dependency primitives
1419.
by rezonant 6y ago
Before I comment here: I am a fan of systemd in many ways, and I happily use it on my systems. That being said, you do really have to think about the systemic factors at play here. As noted in the original article, Debian found itself in a
1420.
by rezonant 6y ago
> Keeping things in separate source databases with explicit interfaces is a well understood way of reducing the chances of ending up with a ball of mud. I don't think this invalidates the thrust of your point, and I don't neces
1421.
by rezonant 7y ago
it's normal for websockets to show as pending in devtools. Check the Messages tab
1422.
by rezonant 7y ago
For the person playing or the person doing the judging?
1423.
by rezonant 7y ago
Sounds like just about every "cosmetic" premium currency microtransaction "live service" "episodic" triple A video game that's come out in awhile and they didn't even need the browser to do it!
1424.
by rezonant 7y ago
How are we supposed to vet Github accounts to know whose contributions we can accept? This is crazy.
1425.
by rezonant 7y ago
You need to do a post-mortem on this. What exactly did Aurelia do to trigger this to start with? A contribution from a sanctioned country? A github issue posted by someone from a sanctioned country? How exactly are open source projects supp
1426.
by rezonant 7y ago
This, I use it for all Node.js backend requests. Personally I think we need to move to isomorphic solutions and work to unify backend and frontend JS development as much as we can. This one's a no-brainer
1427.
by rezonant 7y ago
> this provides the same functionality as the c program in TFA, without needing gcc. or just using bash: function showargs() { for x in "$@"; do echo "arg: $x"; done }
1428.
by rezonant 7y ago
I'm a little confused by this- if you have multiple independent apps on a machine, would they not already be in separate OS processes?
1429.
by rezonant 7y ago
Web speech to text is still available on Chrome... https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/demos/speech.html
1430.
by rezonant 7y ago
This also raised my eyebrows -- I don't even see the redirect, I just get broken HTTPS if I try to use it. In 2019 (almost 2020!) no website should be served over plain HTTP let alone have broken and nonfunctional HTTPS.
1431.
by rezonant 7y ago
My thought exactly. Someone should mash it up
1432.
by rezonant 7y ago
Installing trust store certificates for these purposes is asking for trouble. Sure, if the private key is unique per installation it theoretically should be fine, but in reality it can be hard to gather enough entropy to be satisfiably unpr
1433.
by rezonant 7y ago
You should use browser navigation (different url per page) because a single tap on back button brings you back to hackernews :)
1434.
by rezonant 7y ago
That is how it works to the best of my knowledge, but most users don't browse that way; they browse from the home page. Hence it's a perceived issue to a lot of creators. Not saying I agree that the answer is no recommendation eng
1435.
by rezonant 8y ago
As far as I can tell, they don't even have a trademark on Pale Moon (EDIT): Ah shucks, USPTO TESS links don't work correctly. Anyway just search for "Pale Moon", I couldn't find anything relevant. http://
1436.
Show HN: Alterior, a Typescript HTTP framework with dependency injection(github.com)
2 points by rezonant 8y ago|0 comments