rewmie

65 ms·

811.
by rewmie 3y ago
> I still think they should stop adding new features and do what the C committee does in keeping the language stable over the decades which it will take to slowly die, as it should. Other than catering to your unexplainable desire to see
812.
by rewmie 3y ago
> And conversely there are plenty of startups (the majority even) that had excellent engineering but failed due to a myriad of other reasons. "Engineering = success" is a very naive view of the industry and the world. You'
813.
by rewmie 3y ago
> Not building an entire system down to class level (...) That was never the point of modeling languages. Your baseless assumption is even more absurd when you factor in the fact that modeling languages even express runtime behavior, com
814.
by rewmie 3y ago
A startup lives and dies by the engineers. Without them there is no product. This very case documents how engineers created value only to get new arrivals whose net contribution is non-positive, to the point they effectively drive out the
815.
by rewmie 3y ago
> (...) and these other people who they hate so much in fact do critical jobs and (...) Just because someone is hired for a position of a sales rep/account manager/business people, that does not mean they walk over water. Those
816.
by rewmie 3y ago
> (...) it must also be a good use for every instance of that class. You, and OP, failed to present a single argument supporting the thesis that modeling languages in general, and UML in particular, are "lunacy and a massive red fla
817.
by rewmie 3y ago
> If you think creating a new form factor that others want to standardize means pushing boundries, then no. I'm not sure your opinion is well founded. Take a cursory look at Amazon,and search for mini PCs. The bulk of all the offers
818.
by rewmie 3y ago
> Starting with UML to describe a set of classes or - worse yet - an entire system is lunacy and a massive red flag. I don't think this is right or a well founded opinion. The whole point of any diagram language, including UML, is t
819.
by rewmie 3y ago
> The problem isn't generating UML from code, the problem is generating useful UML from code. I would kill for a tool that could output class and sequence diagrams from a project or component. If the format is editable and tools can
820.
by rewmie 3y ago
> The industry started rejecting Waterfall, early design and system architects, in favor of Agile, just-in-time design and empowering developers. So we saw no need for these visual design tools to model the entire system, since we ended
821.
by rewmie 3y ago
Mini itx is over two decades old. micro atx is even older. Did ASRock had anything to do with any of the standards? Meanwhile, any product being sold by the likes of Beelink and Minisforum is far smaller than any of those standard. The boar
822.
by rewmie 3y ago
I'm not sure that's right. Does ASRock have any product in the miniPC market? All I see are brands like Beelink and Minisforum, and they shove Ryzen5/7/9 and Core i5/i7/i9 in boxes similar to raspberry pis.
823.
by rewmie 3y ago
> Well, I have seen some heat specifically against the habit popular on Java and C# of passing dependencies into factories and getting classes with completely different interfaces as a result. In other words, you saw a bug in a software
824.
by rewmie 3y ago
> but I think IoC is becoming commonly accepted as a bad pattern. I have no idea where you got that from. Inversion of control is perhaps the most important design pattern ever devised, and IoC frameworks make or break any project. Where
825.
by rewmie 3y ago
> Looking at GPL code doesn't poison your mind forever. If you purposely go through the source code of a project to get inspiration and afterwards you are so inspired that you end up implementing the same thing in your code, you&#x2
826.
by rewmie 3y ago
> This is such a case of lawyer brain. I'm not sure you are fully aware of the implications. In fact, it seems you're dismissing easily avoidable risks by arguing you'd never be caught. You can read plenty of code without
827.
by rewmie 3y ago
You don't seem to be very curious because your questions are clarified literally in the very first comment in OP's link.
828.
by rewmie 3y ago
> I don’t see how you could get misled when the peaks are annotated and immediately and clearly visible. This is a textbook graphing error, or worse graphing manipulation. Humans perceive proportions, and not including the origin of a gr
829.
by rewmie 3y ago
> I imagine it would be faster on most hardware to use an array than a map due to LX caches. I didn't understood your point. I mean, a hash map is basically an array whose index is calculated from a key.