Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
revskill
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Everytime "just" is mentioned, i question the life again.
32.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
They are not intelligent.
33.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
LLM is not AI, it's dumbass, too stupid to NOT assume and hallucinate.
34.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Truth. To some extend, the agent doesn't know what it's doing at all, it lacks real brain, maybe we should just treat them as the hard worker.
35.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
The critical issue with LLM which never beats human: break what worked.
36.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Manuality is a dicease.
37.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Qwen is still naive for large codebase understanding.
38.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Nontech human is destroyed soon. To add more context, the futuristic human is the programmer who can just program everything he wants to replace current manual systems. Human is then the architect, ai is the labor.
39.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Rails is hard to maintain tgat is why github is slow to innovate.
40.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Instead of a dockerfile now u got a vendor lockin thing.
41.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Productivity could just be simple automation. U just describe one part of the whole process. My point stands still. If u cannot get llm to benefit u, u are the problem.
42.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Those "experienced" actually are just senior code monkeys if u ask me, it's trivial right ? I don't assume the reason why, but it's just illogical for a junior to get benefits and the seniors don't. The wrong o
43.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
No, it's just logical, LLM is a useful tool, those experienced are just code monkeys that whey they got stuck.
44.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
You have prompt skill issue.
45.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Lol, vercel again.
46.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
No. They are hype.
47.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
There's nothing about "model" in MCP at all, they're just json rpc ?
48.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
The question is about why not.
49.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
"If an(y) LLM could operate on your codebase without much critical issues, then your architecture is sound" - revskill
50.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Sure.
51.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Sam does nog know how to code that why his models are bad at understanding context for real world code generation.
52.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
What does that mean ?
53.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
You missed the point. What i mean, is your pricing scheme is a scam because u never know if your bot response would solve customer issue. Stop this madness, ok >?
54.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
No, you just over complicate things.
55.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Credit based pricing is broken. No way u produce shiy then user get out of credit to get nothing done.
56.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Secrets mean it is not stable yet ?
57.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Gemini is good enough ?
58.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
How do people actually without ai models ???
59.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Sweet. No need a framework to do that.
60.
▲
by
revskill
1y ago
Confusing on consistency. I am not sure when it knows or do not know what it is doing at all. Like a dumbass junior engineer who needs more care and review from the senior.
More ›