revelio

57 ms·

631.
by revelio 4y ago
Native library interfacing isn't really Python's strong suit, interpreter plugins are quite painful to write. .NET has P/Invoke which is much nicer. JVM is getting Panama+jextract, which is the nicest yet. You can go straight
632.
by revelio 4y ago
I'm not renewiltord, who actually talked about public health officials not the CDC, unless he edited that part of his post. Hardly makes a difference though. CDC advice in March 2020 was that the vast majority don't need to wear o
633.
by revelio 4y ago
There's a Java ML library called Tribuo that might be worth looking at.
634.
by revelio 4y ago
The funny thing is, later down in the thread someone says the EPA already admitted their instruments can't detect toxin levels that are already known to be hazardous to health. So indeed their sampling method is wrong (or at least inad
635.
by revelio 4y ago
The headline is rather editorialized by Vice. From the original Belgian article (auto translation): “Everything was fine until about two years ago. He started to become eco-anxious”, begins Claire. At the time, Pierre was working as a rese
636.
by revelio 4y ago
Oh how quickly we forget. https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2021-07-27/timeline-cd... March 24, 2020 Even as the coronavirus spreads across the United States — shutting down businesses, sporting events an
637.
by revelio 4y ago
Maybe. I found the link to the form in the Plus FAQ, but neither the answer nor the form say anywhere that it's limited to Plus. I see nothing stopping anyone from filling it out even for free users. I guess you do need an "organi
638.
by revelio 4y ago
There's no comparison between murder and anything data related, obviously. Also, logging chats and using those logs is not meaningfully different to search engines logging web searches and using them to improve web search, which they
639.
by revelio 4y ago
You're right, I was mistaken. What they changed is they now offer the ability to opt-out of that: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6950777-chatgpt-plus https://docs.google.com/forms/d&
640.
by revelio 4y ago
They say they do the verification for "security reasons", which is a lawful basis and accepted justification under GDPR (it helps them control abuse and make bans stickier). You assented to it when you signed up.
641.
by revelio 4y ago
They do notify you and explain it: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6613520-phone-verificati... This is also covered under the "consent" lawful basis part of the GDPR. The bug is not a problem. GDPR c
642.
by revelio 4y ago
Verbosity isn't the same thing as precision. The judgement is both vague and inconsistent, as GDPR related things always are. They don't want OpenAI using personal data for training, which it doesn't do anyway, unless they me
643.
by revelio 4y ago
The article and related articles in the series are a pretty good place to start! They're laying down a lot of rigorous evidence that depression is strongly clustered in the most left wing segments of the population. Now correlation isn
644.
by revelio 4y ago
"You cite a single paper" It's not a paper, so this makes me think you didn't read the cited document. "by agencies and institutions with no relationship to each other" They're all closely related to e
645.
by revelio 4y ago
It's not about insects specifically but this paper points out statistical problems in a very similar claims about vertebrates: https://www.sfu.ca/biology2/rEEding/pdfs/Leung_et_al_Cluster... But it'
646.
by revelio 4y ago
The law should make sense, and your argument is exactly the same as the one Google used with chats, there isn't any difference. It could easily be argued that phone calls are "recorded" by the VOIP systems. Especially because
647.
by revelio 4y ago
Then the Italian authorities will be pleased to know that the bug is already fixed, and thus there's nothing for them to do. Unless GDPR is now being interpreted as a general obligation to never write bugs, in which case, they will hav
648.
by revelio 4y ago
Of course they do. All political donations involve "hope" because you can't directly control what a politician says or does with money. You can only fund allies and then hope or assume they remain allies. In the case of Rand
649.
by revelio 4y ago
They already stopped using chats as training material for everyone anyway, so if that's the basis for the ban then it's already wrong. But what do you expect? This is exactly the kind of problem people have constantly pointed out
650.
by revelio 4y ago
You're talking about a website you have to specifically visit and type your personal information in to, which doesn't even ask for your name and which is simultaneously being accused of not knowing enough about you (your age). The
651.
by revelio 4y ago
If you're being rate limited your mail is probably going to the spam folder for a lot of people anyway, and/or are going to accounts that are no longer active. It's not the absolute number of spam reports that matters it&#x27
652.
by revelio 4y ago
Isn't it more likely that he's just being consistent with his prior principles, and bytedance donated to him knowing that he'd be a reliable ally and thus wanting him to remain in Congress?
653.
by revelio 4y ago
That's not a gotcha for libertarians because libertarianism has a whole philosophy around the use of violence, which abortion would fall under. That is libertarians do not consider there to be a right to violence except in cases of sel
654.
by revelio 4y ago
You've forgotten what really happened. He was trying to get to Ecuador when the USA revoked his passport. He got stuck at the airport in Moscow as a consequence and was kept there for a long time because the Russians didn't want h
655.
by revelio 4y ago
The relevant bit of law says: "If electronically stored information that should have been preserved in the anticipation or conduct of litigation is lost because a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve it" The argumen
656.
by revelio 4y ago
If you read the judgement, the judge doesn't really see any distinction between "can technically record" and "must record", with only financial burdens being accepted as a justification for not doing so. The reasoni
657.
by revelio 4y ago
The sorts of studies that proclaim loss of 50% of insects don't check out when looked at closely. As you might guess, counting insects is quite hard, doing so reliably over time is much harder still and then assigning causality harder
658.
by revelio 4y ago
Your post said very explicitly, "There are a lot of very smart experts on that signatory list" and then named Wozniak as an example of one of them. But Woz isn't an AI expert. It's entirely appropriate to point that out!
659.
by revelio 4y ago
When people don't even realize it exists, that's the mark of truly successful propaganda! "8 consecutive heat waves that shattered all known records in the area" Yeah, where is this? I doubt it's actually true. Fo
660.
by revelio 4y ago
Yes, women are treated much better in general especially at that age. Not sure where you got the college campus thing. The article is about teenagers. They mostly haven't gone to college yet.

More ›