revelation

1644 ms·

3511.
by revelation 15y ago
Apparently, the one core qualification for software development is to write radical, but philosophical articles to no end about it.
3512.
by revelation 15y ago
For all anyone can prove, its random data. What are they going to do next time I safely erase a file? Throw me in jail for contempt because I can't magically turn the random data into incriminating evidence?
3513.
by revelation 15y ago
What kind of insane argument is that. You can't just start a new MegaUpload and have the big crime profits flow in instantaneously. It takes time to build a new user (and data) base.
3514.
by revelation 15y ago
Another? How many JavaScript games are there even?
3515.
by revelation 15y ago
There are really Markov chain generated books on Amazon? I guess it is becoming a trash dumpster after all.
3516.
by revelation 15y ago
Certainly Google doesn't "like" to make any kind of solutions to help a dying industry. The content recognition system likely cost in the tens of millions in development and is probably eating up lots and lots of processing power just to op
3517.
by revelation 15y ago
Sure, thats cool, but a single web app is not the place for that. Instead, places like GitHub and the like need to get smarter about what they are actually storing and facilitate collaborative analysis that way.
3518.
by revelation 15y ago
string hell squared.
3519.
by revelation 15y ago
I hate all that old baggage as much as the next guy, forward declarations, header guards... But C++11 has improved on that aswell, as much as possible within the old framework.
3520.
by revelation 15y ago
What nonsense. SMS gateways are so 2000. This would be more interesting if their mission was to integrate all the various kinds of notification systems, including SMS, into one unified solution.
3521.
by revelation 15y ago
No, people need to realize that cars weighing in at 3+ tons with capacity for 5+ passengers to transport a single person to work are not viable. Because the "give us something we can hotswap for oil" attitude is obviously going nowhere.
3522.
by revelation 15y ago
This is a facepalm on so many levels: - oil company predicts oil will still be used in (a lot of) years - oil company realizes that a) there is an incredible amount of energy in oil and b) the most efficient machines available use only smal
3523.
by revelation 15y ago
I know you just want to make the case for a more differentiated view here, but what you are in fact doing is defending a higher tax rate on work than for capital gains through mere ownership.