return0

63 ms·

601.
by return0 10y ago
What about the other referenced article from Fortune? http://fortune.com/2016/11/25/russian-fake-news/
602.
by return0 10y ago
who needs a hole in the ground?
603.
by return0 10y ago
"And so, in 2016, the World news war 1 began, my grandchildren"
604.
by return0 10y ago
Yesterday there was a donor who gave $5000 but i don't see her name on the list now.
605.
by return0 10y ago
I think thats the emotion this is meant to evoke.
606.
by return0 10y ago
Looks more anti-consumerist than specific politics tbh.
607.
by return0 10y ago
> has no way of forcing the VPN to keep Are we sure of that? they might require that for UK customers
608.
by return0 10y ago
How long before they extend this to VPN users?
609.
by return0 10y ago
It matters to be the last one , not the first one.
610.
by return0 10y ago
thats not related
611.
by return0 10y ago
> its just that liberals are ahead of the curve in being skeptical about information on the Net. The entire raison-d-etre of the "alternative right" websites is that conservative views are being suppressed in the entire leftist
612.
by return0 10y ago
You could say the same thing about fake TV news comedy shows where lots of millenials get their news. It's all over the spectrum. Be careful what you wish for when you want "bad ideas" banned.
613.
by return0 10y ago
It's a good thing that there is no equivalent of this in the information age. A digital copy is just as good as any original.
614.
by return0 10y ago
Parent's rhetoric is self-righteous namecalling. That does nothing to persuade people, it only makes them come back at you. He/she may think they do a service to people, but they are only turning more people to name-callers. As su
615.
by return0 10y ago
and boobs and penises
616.
by return0 10y ago
and what is reddit without drama?
617.
by return0 10y ago
On the other hand, i can claim that the admin edited my comments whenever i 'm wrong.
618.
by return0 10y ago
the donald is well moderated, esp. from doxxing and other personal stuff. they are of course very lively and get to the nerves of leftists, but that's about it. it's actually quite entertaining if you can leave behind enmities (an
619.
by return0 10y ago
was he drunk or in urgent need of a break? OTOH , good of him to take the responsibility immediately. OTOH, maybe he even wanted to send a message to those who rely too much in reddit's freedom.
620.
by return0 10y ago
While i strongly agree with the spirit of the statement , unfortunately it falls under "if not me, someone else will do it". Now that people have found out the power of social media, it's a power to be abused.
621.
by return0 10y ago
At some point not far from today the western governments should legislate freedom of speech in social media. We are now at 40% of people getting their news from them. Is that not a big enough number to stop pretending they are "just pr
622.
by return0 10y ago
I usually just pretend that i just killed someone to get the money they asked for.
623.
by return0 10y ago
They are trying to do that with personal identity politics. I dont see that going well either
624.
by return0 10y ago
Kudos move for Zuck to try to appease investors but i think he knows himself this thing is not working, and i m glad he does.
625.
by return0 10y ago
> Nobody cared about fake news on Facebook And crucially nobody cared during the thousands of elections/uprisings around the world in which facebook played a role.
626.
by return0 10y ago
mainly there is no repercussion
627.
by return0 10y ago
You're crossing a line when you decide which propaganda is censored.
628.
by return0 10y ago
That's hard to tell. Were the reports of hillary's imminent win false? of course they were. Were they deliberately lying? Probably not . Could they have lied less if they had done some actual research? Probably yes. Did it matter
629.
by return0 10y ago
wow thats an insane number
630.
by return0 10y ago
you mean, normal cheese

More ›