return0

52 ms·

1. 511.▲
   by return0 10y ago

   And monetized and paid for through google ads. It's your life, packaged.
2. 512.▲
   by return0 10y ago

   There's a lot of politics in science, so these people have a fair share of experience i would guess.
3. 513.▲
   by return0 10y ago

   too many to list http://reason.com/archives/2016/08/26/most-scientific-result...
4. 514.▲
   by return0 10y ago

   Then the author should be more honest. "We must fight to add nuclear power to trump's plan". That other 'fact' is inconsequential.
5. 515.▲
   by return0 10y ago

   I don't think so. So scientists should fight to keep their jobs even if their science is bad? Some of the best science came from the most unlikely places, and was not funded.
6. 516.▲
   by return0 10y ago

   Thanks for saying that. I wonder why nature feels that scientists around the world need to read pure fluff which presents speculation as fact. Maybe because they want to bias scientists for or against someone? Science still needs to be blin
7. 517.▲
   by return0 10y ago

   Freezing EPA funds is not mentioned in the article. The rest is media talk, but not science. Trump is not a scientist. Still looking for the facts in this article...
8. 518.▲
   by return0 10y ago

   This kind of article does not belong to Nature. It talks about what the media said as evidence , undefined alternative facts , how "Rejecting mainstream science has become a theme for Trump", yet the only fact presented is that
9. 519.▲
   by return0 10y ago

   > Instead of less farmers, we need more That's bad for the economy and productivity, and for the environment in the end because more farmers with smaller land are squeezing for gains. It's especially a problem in in the EU whe
10. 520.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    Nobody envies Corbyn like he does himself. I thought the guy was a closeted pro-brexiter anyway.
11. 521.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    Are there not alternatives to smoking for taking nicotine?
12. 522.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    They were being hypocritical by being hyper-critical.
13. 523.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    For some reason Uber reminds me of the rental car business. Yeah it appears to be hard to build a monopoly there.
14. 524.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    Strange how the article doesn't mention that (not Hinton), Hopfield, Sejnowski, Kohonen , Amari etc. etc. were all phycisists. Also, physicists working for software is not only a silicon-valley phenomenon .
15. 525.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    To be fair only failed countries have poor drug regulations. There is no advanced country (able to do quality medical research) without strict regulations.
16. 526.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    I expect lightweight, ergonomic VR or AR to replace desktop monitors in a few years. which means desks may no longer be needed. time to short IKEA - oh wait they re not listed.
17. 527.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    does the virus have to be injected too, or does it pass the blood-brain barrier?
18. 528.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    Maybe if there weren't so many regulations and taboos in science, this trial would be run a research institution instead of a private company.
19. 529.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    <NEXTID N="55"> I wonder what that is
20. 530.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    It's unfair and rather cruel to pit humans vs computers. How about we use the AI to design a poker variant that is unbeatable by another AI ?
21. 531.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    That is irrelevant. Uber is not going to become so cheap that even the poorest person can afford it, neither are taxis some new and exciting discovery. Uber is not going to replace mass transit either, because the traffic problem will becom
22. 532.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    Their iphone is certainly the "least bullshit" smartphone , with few gimmicks, reliability and more productive choices (lately they 're trying hard to ruin that however). I dislike their desktop and laptop OSs stronlgy, but i
23. 533.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    That image makes me want an iphone with the original form factor. They could use the entire face for screen and put the button on the side.
24. 534.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    too many to list. see here: http://www.forbes.com/sites/patrickmichaels/2014/01/09/the-l...
25. 535.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    Uber however caters to a specific class of people and they don't seem to be the people who can only afford public transport. This may not be an issue in America, but i think if cities change their public transit planning to accomodate
26. 536.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    The question is whether they should trust scientists about policy decisions, not whenther they should trust scientists about science. Political/ideological decisions don't have to rely on science, this "political scientism&q
27. 537.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    > If half the population needs a reminder on why science is good I guess they'll get it. I don't know if you looked at science lately, but the majority of the science published is actually not-that-great, if not bad. The publi
28. 538.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    > His view count and credibility slip by the day regardless of whether he's right or not, partially as a result of his focus Fake news
29. 539.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    - Architect (of buildings) - Farmer (been there; my fallback option) - That person who works in the IS18 infrasound station that detects nuclear explosion sound waves in Greenland ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vULUkp7Ttss
30. 540.▲
    by return0 10y ago

    And both are outliers. There are very few hugely successful projects, but billions of blog posts.