resonanttoe

9 ms·

31.
by resonanttoe 7y ago
At Immigration: Scanned, no, Photographed, yes. (So depending on your definition) At TSA, They scan the first page of passport (or local ID) and usually Full body scan. So in the strict sense of facially scanned no. At the gate (until now),
32.
by resonanttoe 7y ago
I’m not certain of the particular setup here (per airport thing) but I’ve never had them scan my passport at the gate in a US Airport, only at Immigration checkpoints for international travel and TSA. This is especially true for domestic tr
33.
by resonanttoe 7y ago
The point this article misses entirely is that the Facial recognition system is now at the gate which is ostensibly Delta’s territory. It isn’t US Boarder Control running the facial control system, its Delta, Southwest, or anyone else, whic
34.
by resonanttoe 7y ago
Yeh that's unfortuante but it is normal for box's API. This isn't Google being overly grabby, its the only scope available to third party read and writing to box. The API scope doesn't have any knowledge of individual fi
35.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
It's not up to me as a reader to prove whether they are lying or not. As a writer you either have integrity and assume your audience is knowledgeable and skeptical of unverifiable claims or you can exploit the fact that they aren'
36.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
This is slightly off topic and relatively minor, but man does it represent the piss poor state of Tech writers and their articles. "I was curious how often this go-to one liner was used. I scraped every reported notification to the Cal
37.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
If the DNS client has a pinned certificate/key this would break the MiTM/Middleware. But remember that you're only using the TLS connection for the DNS question and answer, so if you choose something like cloudflare/goog
38.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
You're making claims that are entirely unsupported by anything you've provided or said. The paper linked makes the claim towards the failure of academic economics failing to predict the Financial crisis of 2008, not science. (Thi
39.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
IANAL but I think you're safe to bring it on board. SEC. 534 from https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4/te... just seeks to classify E-cigs in the same class as traditional cigar
40.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
So do you have anything to support these fairly fantastical claims?
41.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
Typically yes. This is base hardening. The usual vulnerabilities can be just default configuration options or unwanted firmware/software features. Similarly no security team is going to say "There are no vulnerabilities in the ser
42.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
Agreed, but lets not get ahead of ourselves. The statement is the "Driver no longer works for waymo" not that "they were fired for the incident.". That feels somewhat deliberate choice of words to me.
43.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
yeh this is probably miles better than what I do to my Nanos.
44.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
Not quite. A 6 digit code can be phished out from users pretty easily. They'll enter it anywhere its asked, similar to a password. However the U2F and Fido spec requires a Cryptographic assertion (with all that replay attack mitigation
45.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
I looked in to it a while ago, but none except for portability. The Nano's are designed to take up a USB slot and be semi-permanent in there. That is, they can be removed, but its not as easy as removing a normal USB key. Either good g
46.
by resonanttoe 8y ago
But that's not what the article says and it does that on purpose. The phrase "Google Employees resign in protest" is significant from a writers PoV. If they had sources and evidence to suggest it was close to the project, the
47.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
Or you could make sure vendors follow RFC2822. Now admittedly its dense to read, but the two sections that are relevant are; https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-3.2.4 & https://tools.ietf.org&#x2
48.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
I can't begin to thank you enough for this and how much its going to change all of my online interactions. :D
49.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
Is that article two paragraphs long without source or attribution or am I doing the web wrong?
50.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
I think you've hit on the core of the problem but the solution is always skated around. "But in games you are forced to interact, either as co-op or opponent." The typical response here is to give players a greater degree of
51.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
Given that you're describing your Mum in the same fashion we typically all do (And to avoid the "Yes, she's actually very technical" bait-n-switch), we'll assume no. You're mixing the ubiquity and common parlan
52.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
These types of write ups (though sometimes very technically interesting) always have the "Don't you know who I am?" about them, which is very annoying.
53.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
So the headline here had me focus on something that annoyed me. Oh and I should say, I'm neither Silicon Valley based or elite or interested in water beyond the normal scope of human survival :P The implication "Silicon Valley eli
54.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
Oh cheers! I had no idea. Thanks for the pointer :D
55.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
Yeh there are a lot of updates. But (and this has come up elsewhere) people call every update a firmware update and its not. Not every update is a firmware update. But every update is a software update. Firmware in this context is (most lik
56.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
Totally agree, but the chance of that happening is pretty low. There isn't perceived to be a problem in that area at the moment that Governments worldwide really need to fix. To the copyright point. Standard copyright will still apply
57.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
Yeh this sounds plausible. I have felt that the virtual console prices are way to high for what they are. But stuff it in $10 worth of largely OSS and off the shelf hardware with a pretty case and sell it for $60 and I'm all in. I thin
58.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
I think this is pretty spot on. The market back in the 80s was an experimental fledgling market that was prone to crashing and loss of faith. This was largely solved through licensing however rather than technical drm (Nintendo lockout chip
59.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
Re: Development cost. I think we probably just have different perceptions on what that cost will be. I'm happy to disagree with you here, but I think we'll talk around the lack of any facts here. (Read: I have nothing I can presen
60.
by resonanttoe 9y ago
I think we as users would prefer that Nintendo prefers this. But no, Nintendo wants you to buy the next console that has the Virtual console of all those games you'll emulate through homebrew. Abandonware has ceased to exist in the con

More ›