repelsteeltje

5 ms·

31.
by repelsteeltje 4mo ago
That sounds terrible! Feels like your LLM agent probably has more control over your computer than you. Can't imagine being confined to a prison like that, but I suppose there are other aspects (monetary or otherwise) of the job that ma
32.
by repelsteeltje 4mo ago
Precisely. There is nothing preventing you from doing the same in Linux: rather than installing docker, install docker on a Linux VM (ie. using KVM). Conversely, docker containers don't actually exist on MacOs. Docker desktop is mere
33.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
> An economy that doesn’t need human labor is a political crisis of a kind democratic systems have never faced. This isn't entirely accurate. I can think of Norway as an example of a small economy that after discovery of large gas a
34.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Yes. Great news, for now. Trust is hard to gain, but easy to lose.
35.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
That's also true
36.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Well, at least the way he handless the typewriter and scribbles seems somewhat performative. If it's just a draft version, he seems capable of handling the typing hammers very professionally, adding online corrections staying within ma
37.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Yes. And indeed, abstraction is not what LLMs are offering.
38.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Ahhh in yes, that makes sense. I get it now
39.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
I think you misread that. He's recommending not completely banning the subject.
40.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
> [...] quantum-inspired computing built on CMOS technology [...] So at the heart of the solution is some FPGA that does something (close to?) quantum computing and that helps exploring exponential search space in somewhat feasible way?
41.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Thanks. Is wails a Go stdlib component, as GP implied or is it third party?
42.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Interesting. I'm not very familiar with Go. What is the equivalent for Tauri in Go's stdlib? Would it make sense to continue using Go for the frontend and doing only the backend in Rust for your user case?
43.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
I guess I just misunderstand what is being attested. Is the attestation proving that your randomly assigned UUID belongs to a human, or conversely, does a proof of work simply prove that your device "owns" some UUID?
44.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Yes, but isn't there an unplugged hole in the account creation (or fresh install) if that gets you a new UUID with 0 monthly attestation count?
45.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
I still don't get how those 1000 posts tallied with previous UUID would get correlated with the new UUID. If it's only source IP address or similar finger prints, those are relatively easy to get rid off, hide, renew. (At least, w
46.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
+1 Wasting everyone's time and clogging up the court system perfectly describes the heart of this matter. Plain bullying and hype.
47.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
> You're just describing a regular cookie. Yes regular cookie from Google's perspective, but super in that it works across sites. If for some reason you don't just take Google's word you might suspect they collude and
48.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
So, essentially a super cookie? That is, generated once (at random or arbitrarily) and then included with proof of work? But not a fingerprint or otherwise linked to identity? But then that would not work against correlating fraud detection
49.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Sounds pretty much like they're identify the device, then. Or is "device id" Apple lingo for a specific tech?
50.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
So at 3x times the monetary rate, Google is literally selling it's customers?!
51.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
I somewhat disagree that you shouldn't be aware of how the engine works. The mechanics are quite simple. Prolog's horn clauses are combined in depth first search manner trying to proof that the negated goal is false. However, most
52.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
You might as well have ignored or removed the GPL notice. Running it through the LLM laundering gets you a "fork" of unknown origin, questionable quality. You're still potentially open to supply chain issues but the chain is
53.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
I found this interview [0] on the subject of AI in CS education on the Oxide & Friends podcast very illuminating. Of course, Brown University CS != All education, but interesting angle nevertheless. [0] Episode webpage: https:/&
54.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Seems only fair that we pay our taxes when those are used to subsidize such lofty endeavours.
55.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Great example. So this "unspecified behavior" might turn into the more nasal demon type when g(), h() and i() share mutable state and assume some particular sequential order of execution. No?
56.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
UB != unsafe
57.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
I'm sure there have been attempts at defining a language that has no UB, but afaik all meaningful languages have UB in some dark corner or enumerated explicitly. For example, Java thread execution order is UB.
58.
OpenAI's KOSA Endorsement Is Regulatory Capture with a Smiley Face(techdirt.com)
15 points by repelsteeltje 5mo ago|0 comments
59.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
Yeah, like key bindings in IntelliJ that might make sense on Windows or Macintosh, but conflict with Linux defaults. I switched to Linux couple of decades ago, but this second class treatment of Linux desktop is one of the reasons I'm
60.
by repelsteeltje 5mo ago
... and the safety argument is a great way of saying "no" disguised as a "yes, if ..." to your prospects.

More ›