remram

17 ms·

181.
by remram 1y ago
This is not "malicious compliance", this is more like "pedantic enforcement". "Malicious compliance" would be if the same team booked a 50min meeting then a 10min meeting in the same room.
182.
by remram 1y ago
No, you can't. Using one session, every client have to show exactly the same panels with the same layout in the same terminal size.
183.
by remram 1y ago
I don't know how to read your comment other than "nothing hard is worth doing". Some things have benefits and drawbacks, is the existence of drawbacks always a non-starter for you? I'm trying to phrase this as delicately
184.
by remram 1y ago
The uncertainty of the assignment and the lack of responsiveness during this week-long unpaid endeavor are inexcusable. Your anecdote strikes me as a totally different process as Kagi's in every possible way. The problem is not the l
185.
by remram 1y ago
I built a simple OSS tool for qualitative data analysis, which needs to turn uploaded documents into text (stripped HTML). PDFs have been a huge problem from day one. I have investigated many tools, but two-column layouts and footers etc of
186.
by remram 1y ago
I switched to tmux and I switched back due to the weird server/session/window/pane model that makes no sense and prevents me from showing different windows or layouts on different clients. 4 levels of objects is ridiculous an
187.
by remram 1y ago
I made no such assumption, I wrote "web (or desktop)". Web is what I have now. A problem with desktop clients is that they are usually generic IMAP clients, meaning they have limited support for server-side search, non-standard fe
188.
by remram 1y ago
That's fair, still if I put in the effort to migrate, I would rather not do it to another company whose business is selling eyeballs. Amazon's business (maybe not WorkMail? who knows) is to sell you a maximum of stuff on their mar
189.
by remram 1y ago
Leaving Google for Amazon makes no sense to me, Amazon fits GP's list just as well.
190.
by remram 1y ago
What's a good replacement? Needs to work on web and mobile (or desktop and mobile), have search, have labels, have automated filters.
191.
by remram 1y ago
What? You have to schedule it, they literally wait 3 days before they start it, and then it can take most of a day to get it ready for download. It is not fast.
192.
by remram 1y ago
Having control is good, but reading all the code yourself seems unrealistic. We need something like crev or cargo-vet.
193.
by remram 1y ago
The package showed a big license agreement and implemented circumvention steps! We're a bit beyond the D-Bus auditing issues.
194.
by remram 1y ago
I can't tell what this does from the readme. Does it package a container runtime in the exe? Or a virtual machine? Something else?
195.
by remram 1y ago
Docker is not emulation so there's no waste of resources.
196.
by remram 1y ago
This is really concerning, how many other packages are distributed by OpenSUSE which do not match their policies and are not reviewed? A Linux distribution is supposed to be more coherent and vetted than an app store. This... does not inspi
197.
by remram 1y ago
I don't believe that actually, neither does Ubuntu. And if we're talking about memory bugs (which we were up to now), then definitely no. But run0 is new C code anyway so I don't see how your claim is relevant.
198.
by remram 1y ago
So what's your recommendation? Removing the user?
199.
by remram 1y ago
This one is easy: run0 is not implemented in a memory-safe language, but in C. It is likely to be hit by exploitable memory-handling bugs, like the rest of systemd, as has happened multiple times before.
200.
by remram 1y ago
I don't see how this attack is related to the setuid binary. No matter what method you provide to the user to elevate their privileges, they can be tricked into doing it. If it was provided by a daemon, built into systemd, or anything
201.
by remram 1y ago
How does a computer handle requests without running software? That software has to be written in a programming language.
202.
by remram 1y ago
Maybe one of these? https://dzone.com/articles/queuing-theory-for-software-engin... https://medium.com/@quebostina/stack-and-queue-are-two-of-th...
203.
by remram 1y ago
I'm sorry you took "you're wrong" as aggressive. I am providing sources though and other users are agreeing with me, will you please look into it? Or ask ChatGPT if SQLite is crash-consistent? Please consider the possib
204.
by remram 1y ago
You are wrong, the whole point of the WAL is to make SQLite crash-consistent. Same as the rollback journal. SQLite will safely rollback partial writes. I don't know where you got the idea that in WAL mode, SQLite ditches its consistenc
205.
by remram 1y ago
You can have multiple writer connections from multiple writer processes (on one host at a time). Their transactions will be safely serialized by SQLite. So, sure, from a low-level point of view, the write transactions are not really simulta
206.
by remram 1y ago
WAL mode works on many network filesystems provided it's being written from a single host at a time.
207.
by remram 1y ago
This leverages a dedicated on-line backup API: https://sqlite.org/backup.html
208.
by remram 1y ago
What does "losing transactions" mean? Some transactions will have committed before your backup and some will have committed after and therefore won't be included. I don't see the problem you are trying to solve? Whether
209.
by remram 1y ago
This doesn't solve anything, Redis has proved that it is willing to do a rug pull, and how much they are willing to hurt the community when they do (taking over client libraries, etc). I don't see a reason to go back from valkey.
210.
by remram 1y ago
Still no bookmark tags so don't hold your breath

More ›