reillyse

31 ms·

361.
by reillyse 7y ago
The US has zero cities in the top 30 of that list, not really supporting your argument. (EDIT, it is also amazingly US centric and still doesn't rate US cities higher, NYC is given a base score of 100 and other cities are essentially c
362.
by reillyse 7y ago
Taken with a grain of salt. Supporting free trade is literally one of the founding reasons for this publication. From wikipedia "The Economist was founded by the British businessman and banker James Wilson in 1843, to advance the repea
363.
by reillyse 7y ago
There weren't large numbers of attackers back then. The article is talking about the Neolithic-Era so approx 3500 BC. I would say that it would be relatively easy to defend against 5x the amount of people if you could pick them off as
364.
The UW Teacher Program: Where You Won’t Learn Anything About Teaching(uwstepreview.com)
1 points by reillyse 8y ago|0 comments
365.
Measuring Node Centrality and Partition Risk in Lightning Network(medium.com)
1 points by reillyse 8y ago|0 comments
366.
by reillyse 9y ago
This is exclusively about San Francisco, can you update the title to reflect that?
367.
by reillyse 9y ago
I really feel that any article that quotes the founding story of a startup/company/product is just being plain lazy and it's an instant turn off for me.
368.
3 Surprising Lessons from Ditching My Car in Los Angeles(medium.com)
3 points by reillyse 9y ago|0 comments
369.
by reillyse 9y ago
I shipped that coffee last year, tasted awesome:)
370.
by reillyse 9y ago
Nope. “Last year, the 24-member coffee cooperative harvested 250 pounds of beans.“ So 24 farmers harvested 250 lbs, all of it bought by the one roaster at $60 /lb. Coffee plants take 18 months before they start producing harvestable am
371.
by reillyse 9y ago
So stupid. 250 pounds of beans were harvested. That is less than 2 (150lb) bags of coffee. This is pure novelty. Just because someone can get a coffee plant to grow coffee in California does not mean the coffee will be any good. Coffee grow
372.
by reillyse 9y ago
The double negatives here make this heading really hard to parse (I actually read the abstract thinking something totally different and had to come back to check), maybe something along the lines of "Acne vulgaris exists predominately
373.
by reillyse 9y ago
Yea they are not bad, but cod do batter.
374.
by reillyse 9y ago
If you want your stock photos to look authentic and high quality check out https://www.twenty20.com/
375.
by reillyse 9y ago
What a messed up article. I don't know this CEO but using a picture taken at a festival two years ago as proof of incompetence seems very cheap.
376.
by reillyse 9y ago
Thinking about how to solve a work problem is work.
377.
by reillyse 9y ago
Yes, and people want to be listened to and attributing what you are saying to someone with better credentials is essentially a way of increasing the power of what you are saying.
378.
by reillyse 10y ago
I think a half hour for 1 mile is definitely the exception not the rule. I could see it happening if there was a major accident blocking all of the lanes of the freeway but thats about it. For surface streets I think traffic dissipates much
379.
by reillyse 10y ago
Sure, but travelling on those systems takes a long time. When I lived in London a 1 hour commute was seen as totally normal. That was by train and I had a very direct single overground train to take (Kentish town to Chiswick if I remember).
380.
by reillyse 10y ago
Yes car is king in LA. In recent years though Lyft/Uber have changed the game a lot. I'd say it's cost effective to not have a car at this stage, especially when you add in the cost of parking.
381.
by reillyse 10y ago
Sounds like you need a new job.
382.
by reillyse 10y ago
LA doesn't have a traffic problem. People just have overly high expectations. As someone who has also lived and commuted in lots of cities around the world, LA just doesn't have that much of a problem. What other major city in the
383.
by reillyse 10y ago
The wikipedia article you quote doesn't back up your claim. In fact quite the opposite. From the article. 1) The 27th amendment was first introduced in the house in 1789. It was first ratified by a state in 1789 "Maryland – Decemb
384.
by reillyse 10y ago
Here is another good reference on the early stages of the colonisation of the Americas. I'd highly recommend it (Taylor's American Colonies) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002DBIO2U/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?..
385.
by reillyse 10y ago
Trade deals are needed for all trade, free or otherwise. Having free trade between two countries requires a trade deal.
386.
by reillyse 10y ago
Sure, but 2 centuries is a little long.
387.
by reillyse 10y ago
sure and they'll all have to negotiate a separate trade deal with the UK, we all know how simple those are to get done.
388.
by reillyse 10y ago
and the US has the absolute worst recording on changing their constitution. The last amendment (the 27th) was ratified in 1992 and took nearly 203 years to become law. I think they should lower the barriers to getting stuff done.
389.
by reillyse 10y ago
As an Irishman, I think Dublin is well placed to take a slice of that pie.
390.
by reillyse 10y ago
I don't think thats the point being made. Just that this will probably make German cars more expensive, but Britain doesn't make any good cars of their own and so they don't have a ton of other options.

More ›