reikonomusha

126 ms·

1. 1261.▲
   by reikonomusha 16y ago

   What are your thoughts on this behavior overall? I mean, your opinion. When do we precisely know that '5' means '5::Integer'? At which point does GHC or really Haskell in general, I assume, make this decision?
2. 1262.▲
   by reikonomusha 16y ago

   GHCi, version 6.12.1: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done. Loading package integer-gmp ... linking ... done. Loading package base ... linking ... done. Prelude> :
3. 1263.▲
   by reikonomusha 16y ago

   On what grounds are you affirming that guy's not?
4. 1264.▲
   by reikonomusha 16y ago

   :set +t
5. 1265.▲
   by reikonomusha 16y ago

   Because it's not slander against either of them. See the comments.
6. 1266.▲
   by reikonomusha 16y ago

   (* Standard ML of New Jersey v110.72 [built: Sun May 16 15:16:12 2010] *) - 5; val it = 5 : int (* Objective Caml version 3.11.2 *) # 5;; - : int = 5 // D programming language void main(string[] args){
7. 1267.▲
   by reikonomusha 16y ago

   First, that wasn't said. It was "[o]nce you get past Lisp's idiosyncrasies", such as those described in a later post. It does not talk about getting past fundamental language features that are perhaps missing.
8. 1268.▲
   by reikonomusha 16y ago

   Wrong. We have made them do very fast Fourier transforms now. See http://physics.aps.org/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.180501.pd... for details.