Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
reg_dunlop
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
I extract all emotional context from my prompting and communicate with this tool as though it were an inanimate object which can provide factual information, without any hint of sentience. It's an insane perspective I'm taking I k
32.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
I think what's more sad is someone going out of their way to NOT support the artist. Art is, among other things, a conversation starter. If someone sees an LLM generated thing hanging in the home or office and strikes up a conversation
33.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
Lincoln Park, Lincoln Square (called those 2 neighborhoods home) then Summer and Caldwell Lily Pond. I spent many a summer evening under the promenade in front of the Frank Gehry Bandshell; And the Lily Pond...those posters are stunning. Re
34.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
Thanks! Just bought 4!
35.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
Phrasing this as virtue signaling is a misnomer. I see it as an effort to divest themselves of moral inequity. And the result isn't the point: the effort and the reason for the effort, is. This is the first iteration/calibration o
36.
▲
Context Anchoring
(martinfowler.com)
2 points
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
|
1 comments
37.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
Isn't this just creating more context which must be fed back into the context window?
38.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
I don't understand arguments like this. Universal healthcare? Democratic rule of law? Affordable living wage? Nah, I'll bang the drum of international equality for corporate malfeasance.
39.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
I believe that's a straw man fallacy. My assertion is that an inanimate object becomes a problem when a human interacts with it. Your attempted logical argument is that a law of nature is the same as an inanimate object. I am not conte
40.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
counter counterpoint: A wire sitting on a table does not suck. 2 people can gather around that table and still, the wire does not suck. As soon as 1 person picks up the wire and starts doing something with it....now an interaction with a
41.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
7mo ago
Trust shouldn't be inherent in our adoption of these models. However, constant skepticism is an interesting habit to develop. I agree, continually asking it to justify may seem tiresome, especially if there's a deadline. Though wi
42.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
Isn't that the purpose of red/green refactoring though? To establish working software that expresses regression, and builds trust (in the software)? If your premise is that people would shift to using AI to write tests they don&#x
43.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
Ya know, I just spun up a version of a user-driven exploration game, as an homage to the sf0.org from back in the aughts. https://irl2-production.up.railway.app/ Google auth still not hooked up, but otherwise good enough fo
44.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
I'd love to hear some commentary about my idea surrounding this problem of AI PRs. Why not restrict the agents to writing tests only? If the tickets are written concisely, any feature request or fix could be reduced to necessary spec f
45.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
Thank you! Was looking for this company. Founder was high up at GitHub. Really an interesting proposition
46.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
To answer all of your questions: yes, if I steer it properly. It's very good at spotting design patterns, and implementing them. It doesn't always know where or how to implement them, but that's my job. The specs and syntacti
47.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
Exactly; the original commenter seems determined to write-off AI as "just not as good as me". The original article is, to me, seemingly not that novel. Not because it's a trite example, but because I've begun to experien
48.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
I think it's a matter of implementing different aspects of outcomes into a project/codebase. It's one thing to add skills and system prompts to a project; it's another to accurately frame and orchestrate the various part
49.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
I'm curious how "consumer spending" is quantified here. Is consumer spending measured in total dollars spent? If so, isn't that curious wrinkle in an economy of rising prices, and decreasing purchasing power? If true, I
50.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
Then why do parents put their children's drawings on the refrigerator? I'm not sure if your comment is completely utopian or dystopian. Either way, productivity without human evaluation is not productivity. It's a roomba stuc
51.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
"popping champagne" is a figure of speech (perhaps hyperbole, or an idiom) meant to express not the literal act of "really popping champagne", but instead reaping the benefits of a seemingly poorly calculated business mo
52.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
Now that I've looked at the community discussion over on GH and looked at Hashimoto's Vouch system, I'm failing to see how any of the suggested solutions actually place a human-in-the-loop. I think Vouch does a good job of cr
53.
▲
GitHub acknowledged open source's spam crisis
(medium.com)
1 points
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
|
1 comments
54.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
8mo ago
Why do people make arguments like this? "Work" isn't a finite thing. It's not like all the people in your office today had to complete 100% of their tasks, and all of them did. "Work" is not a static thing. At
55.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
9mo ago
I'm also curious about what a process engineering abstraction layer looks like. Though the final section does hint at it; more integration of more stakeholders closer to the construction of code. Though I have to push back on the idea
56.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
9mo ago
It's the prisoner's dilemma. Or more succinctly: Take something and possibly live, or take nothing and certainly die.
57.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
9mo ago
Dualism?! I believe the quote I referenced wasn't implying any sort of multiplicity...it's subordination of the lesser elements of a single entity and elevation of reverence for the ephemeral. Singularity, baby. singularity, descr
58.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
9mo ago
The idea of "ownership of a body" made me think about a quote I heard a long time ago, while talking amongst musicians while waiting to get up and perform. It felt like some secret knowledge that I gained privilege to, while somew
59.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
10mo ago
Exactly. Where's the guarantee for recognition of future growth....if they don't recognize past growth? The biggest gripe I have about articles such as this is that it assumes a static perspective of "now, into the future&quo
60.
▲
by
reg_dunlop
10mo ago
My therapist used to say: this means you must do it for 40 minutes
More ›