reedjosh

63 ms·

661.
by reedjosh 6y ago
Interesting. Can you please provide a source? I've never heard as such, but would be glad to find otherwise.
662.
by reedjosh 6y ago
Solar & wind != nuclear. Solar and wind are not on demand and require storage that's not currently practical.
663.
by reedjosh 6y ago
And definitely energy intensive to recycle.
664.
by reedjosh 6y ago
> bumbling bureaucrats Sounds like a government problem, not a nuclear problem.
665.
by reedjosh 6y ago
Solar requires energy storage. It is not on demand. Wind and solar must be backed by an on demand source as we don't have sufficiently cost effective storage methods. Options are then basically hydroelectric, natural gas, petroleum, co
666.
by reedjosh 6y ago
The vaccines themselves and vaccine scheduling change over time. How would we know if something harmful was introduced? Unless of course as you state we are unwittingly participating in ad-hoc longitudinal studies. There are any number of `
667.
by reedjosh 6y ago
Yes, and I've started buying grass meats fed from local farms. It does mean that meat is more of a luxury, but I think food should be quality over quantity.
668.
by reedjosh 6y ago
Fair enough. Edited.
669.
by reedjosh 6y ago
I want to review the studies because I don't trust the claims of media or other authorities, not because I don't trust studies. That said, I do intend to be critical of the studies as well--anyone should be. I want to review repli
670.
by reedjosh 6y ago
Wow, fantastic article.
671.
by reedjosh 6y ago
> The people who follow the recommended vaccine schedule don’t have any problems, according to scientific studies. Can you please provide some of the studies? Primarily I want to actually do some research and I want to know what the evid
672.
by reedjosh 6y ago
Pretty sure it was stated sarcastically. It's an exact example of what you said the problem is, so I'd be quite amused if it was meant literally.
673.
by reedjosh 6y ago
TBH, I'm ignorant of these countries' regulatory systems. You may be right. What makes them good examples?
674.
by reedjosh 6y ago
That 2% number depends upon whether you trust the people inflating the USD to tell you what the inflation rate is. Feel free to call shadowstats crazy, but nothing in it is false. It's just another perspective. http://www.sh
675.
by reedjosh 6y ago
Your argument from incredulity doesn't make what I say less true. Maybe my language was a bit strong, but there's no denying if somebody can freely make more of something you value, then they're gaining from your use of said
676.
by reedjosh 6y ago
> Markets fail or succeed because of improper or proper governance. I have yet to see proper governance last long enough to be of any note and worse governance tends to quickly flip to favor the powerful.
677.
by reedjosh 6y ago
> Say everyone in an unstable economy were paid in usd. Then that country would be paying the unseen tax of inflation as the US banking system prints more and more USD. Said country would basically be a US colony.
678.
by reedjosh 6y ago
>What's the point of an unstable, volatile, frantically manipulated currency that is susceptible to social media pump and dump schemes (Elon + Doge)? BTC is only volatile as not enough people use it. Further, if you stay on USD, eve
679.
by reedjosh 6y ago
> This, uh, looks like a semi-propaganda website. In agreement with im3w1l, simply attacking the website is pure argument ad hominem.
680.
by reedjosh 6y ago
I liked your witty response. HN seems to love authority these days.