Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
redwood
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
451.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
PowerSync does something similar I believe
452.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Those uppers are extremely addictive and change you socially. Careful. Slippery slope
453.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
The reverse problem here means it'll be harder and harder to avoid fertilizing females plants grown for flower outdoors!
454.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Have folks seen https://atlas.nomic.ai/ <-- absolutely beautiful vector visualization
455.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Let's please keep HN above this level of discourse. If you're suggesting that bringing HN down to GR comms levels is an improvement, please let's not. (I see that you're pointing out his immaturity but please be explici
456.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
In my experience, multi-region databases are used for HA/DR more so than for "writing locally from multiple places". What this means is that the multi-region "consensus cost" is a far easier problem. It looks like D
457.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Concurrency.
458.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
I'm curious how the implementation compares with LightRAG ( https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG ) ?
459.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
I'd ask the opposite: why would you use a vector index without the related metadata for filtering and hybrid querying. People don't use B-Tree indexes as a standalone separate database off to the side of their database. So why sho
460.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
MySQL powers much larger workloads than Postgres as a number of marquee silicon valley companies. Though it's generally used as a sharded key value store in those scenarios
461.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
I'm curious what the use case/customer demand for something like vectors to be transactional is? It strikes me as something fundamentally less about strong consistency than most use cases in a database. Don't get me wrong, if
462.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Why not mongodb?
463.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Think about it this way: when it actually works, that's not a video you're watching or that's getting amplified on the feed.. social media is a distortion field
464.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Not my experience driving FSD in silicon valley. I was floored
465.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
A good interview with the author https://youtu.be/xw4Wb2v-6yk?si=8uAixLGUCt4Yl9sE
466.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
There's an alternative take--namely that the silk road has dominated recent imagination but was never very dominant compared with sea routes. At least during the era of Roman-Indian shipping lanes: https://youtu.be/xw4W
467.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Maybe most people in there are like you, sightseeing
468.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
They totally did in their own ways. Blockbuster. YouTube. Taxis. Google self driving
469.
▲
China Fines PwC $62M for Botching Its Work for Evergrande
(nytimes.com)
5 points
by
redwood
2y ago
|
0 comments
470.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Depends on who sits in the antitrust seat. It's pretty incredible to realize the one who does today wrote this a few years ago: https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/e.710.Khan.805_zuvfyyeh.p...
471.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Totally and that goes back to their lack of execution as a managed service/SaaS offering because the GTM for those is different, more self-service. If you can't unwind yourself from selling a heavy weight legacy style enterprise s
472.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Out of curiosity, did you pursue a rev share model with Elastic (Co) for your Elastic managed service? I guess that's not something thay can be discussed openly but recognizing you probably had 10x their revenue in the managed service
473.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Hear your concerns but don't you have to look at what your enemy is doing and use that as the barometer for whether you're sufficiently innovative? Seeing Ukraine barely eke through shows we need low cost options
474.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Is the McDonald's of coffee. Why do people go there at all
475.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
My point is to conflate the entire non-relational category into this bucket when one of the two items referenced peaked >10 years ago and the other isn't generally strongly consistent at write time, transactional, or with strongly c
476.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
That makes sense it's more that from first principles when exploring the options it looked like and I see below based on the public page, it wasn't even contemplated.. instead various key value stores without transactionality, and
477.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
I thought this was an interesting take. On the one hand it's peak AI hype hysteria... and part of the thesis feels like it could argue for the opposite: democratization of software development means more software... But I guess the art
478.
▲
The Deflation of Software
(goldmansachs.com)
3 points
by
redwood
2y ago
|
1 comments
479.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Thanks: I think there's a category you're missing, which is transactional document oriented databases with strongly consistent secondary indexes.
480.
▲
by
redwood
2y ago
Right which has been come along way in 15 yrs
More ›