redog

14 ms·

91.
by redog 7y ago
docker run –it mcr.microsoft.com/powershell:preview
92.
by redog 7y ago
> "What if all you need to do is shine light on a material, and this new state comes into being?" Wonder if it's related to photosynthesis?
93.
by redog 7y ago
I used to do this as well except we were transitioning from ship mounted multibeams to AUVs carrying multibeams and subsurface arrays. Simrad EM3000's IIRC. The difference in the amount of necessary data processing was quite a bit. Jus
94.
by redog 7y ago
It's probably a lot like trying to document the internet. Once you've begun you have to start over because of how much will have changed.
95.
by redog 7y ago
Good story but I'm a touch disappointed as I came in expecting a story about making the lenses.
96.
by redog 7y ago
> except that communications directly related to the protection of property may be provided by amateur stations to broadcasters for dissemination to the public where no other means of communication is reasonably available before or at th
97.
by redog 7y ago
What makes them not a "publisher"? A publisher is a person or company that prepares and issues books, journals, music, or other works. Their site literally prepares recordings and streams for issue over the public(?) network.
98.
by redog 7y ago
I like your thinking on this but Cannons existed...I think our failing maybe to fully understand their definitions of their times. That said, I don't think their definition of speech and property would be much different even if we&#x27
99.
by redog 7y ago
>Free speech is a natural right. .... that doesn't mean you wouldn't have that right. Yes but still they have theirs also. That's what people don't seem to connect between the two. You have no right to my property and
100.
by redog 7y ago
Wait what? The first amendment protections are just a limit on GOVERNMENT power. The right is that THE GOVERNMENT won't prevent your speech. Youtube isn't the government, therefore they can limit the fuck out of your speech when y
101.
by redog 8y ago
They could still corner the Fantasy Sports Market.
102.
by redog 8y ago
People are selfish and wish to capitalize on the viral nature of reuse. So they make up "legal rights" to protect their ability to out gain you even after they're long dead.
103.
by redog 8y ago
They're might only be one intended target.
104.
by redog 8y ago
> How will blockchain help in tracking shipments in an accurate, reliable and secure manner and most importantly, how does it stop corruption? We already had double entry accounting in order to establish immutable book entries but that g
105.
by redog 8y ago
> 'if there's a sysadmin, the system is broken.' Am sysadmin, is this best practice or just us being reciprocally lazy again? > It may very well be the case that they are creating a new world that will be marginalized
106.
by redog 8y ago
Isn't it just basically triple entry accounting? Blockchain tech is ultimately about trust. Trust that the accounting hasn't been altered. You don't quite have it solved with just a double entry ledger right?
107.
by redog 8y ago
hangouts
108.
by redog 9y ago
To me this feels like concern without regard for the full differences. With bank accounts you usually have the restriction of "as many accounts as you can afford" where with bitcoin addresses you can have countless. So someone cou
109.
by redog 9y ago
Like a used motor in a "new" car. Unregulated...
110.
by redog 9y ago
I think the only energy efficiency PoW can hope for is the demise of traditional banks and what energy they consume.
111.
by redog 9y ago
Aaron robbed them of their prestige, that I think was his point. A big fuck you. You're not going to use me as your "example" of why you're such a fucking big shot. MIT failed us all and the powers that be are never goin
112.
by redog 9y ago
Financial sovereignty is the goal of the authors. Getting rich is the goal of the crowd.
113.
by redog 9y ago
But that's not the long term plan. The way the community is pushing is out with fiat. If that's the case then the government is going to still want taxes....The way I see it they're either going to lose revenue due to the new
114.
by redog 9y ago
> Can somebody explain what will happen if U.S starts to feel the pressure from Bitcoin and kills it at the point of exchange? Can you explain how they would? To me this sounds like saying the US would ban World of Warcraft cash.
115.
by redog 9y ago
When others' are scared be greedy. When other's are greedy be scared.
116.
by redog 9y ago
No, his numbers are correct. The drops always settle higher than last "crash"'s peak. How long it will continue is anyones guess.. I think It goes on for quite awhile longer. BTC will eventually get expensive very to create b
117.
by redog 9y ago
> you can talk halfway around the world while running off batteries and using a wire thrown over a tree for an antenna. And then what when everyone talks. Isn't it already regulated for this same reasoning? Seems to me a combination
118.
by redog 9y ago
LTE is radio. and WTF is decentralized radio? I don't think you can run a transmitter on the blockchain.
119.
by redog 9y ago
478558 is the last common block 478559 is the forked one.
120.
by redog 9y ago
That feels very apt

More ›