Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
redial
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
I meant to say shared context. Everything you said is part of a shared context or not, those are the only two options.
92.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
That is interesting, but it is also an answer to a different question. The question is "are there any blue reds?" not "can we see in some circumstances reds as blue?".
93.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Not so clear, because you see, that is another question. This is why we need to define things very explicitly and then accept the implications of those definitions or we’ll never get anywhere. Now that you accepted that there is a paradox i
94.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
All those options are the same: they are either part of a shared experience or they are not. Nothing is preventing a demon from deceiving me right now, in fact one can come anytime I'd love to meet him, preferably her.
95.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
> If you're asking if there exists something that's 100% X at the same time as being 100% not-X, I'm not sure there's much to debate about it, as there clearly isn't (at least not in this world, where things can&
96.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Solipsism is basically the only defense against the conclusions from the evidence of the "real" world. But if you argue for solipsism then I say you have much bigger problems than consciousness because you basically rejected ever
97.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Violet is not blue and it is also not red. I'm not asking for a bluish red but for a 100% blue color that it is also red. You are misusing the language, or rather I am in this case, to ask a paradoxical question. Where are all the cat
98.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
I was talking about the royal you: we. But more importantly, "when" the question was first asked doesn't change the nature of the question. Sure, you (we) can ask it, but it is no more insightful that the myriad of other me
99.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
> I'd also put consciousness up there, because it's fundamentally distinct from measurable things. No one knows that it is not measurable. Is love measurable? is hunger? happiness? they seem to be as measurable as consciousness
100.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
> Not only that, but do you have an existence before you are born? If you are inventing mysteries out of thin air why stop there? What if you will yourself into existence? What if it is you that is making "time" perceivable for
101.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
> Or my favorite “Remind me again later” Because who would ever want the ability to say “no” Can't you just change your settings on preferences?
102.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
The "TSA Problem" is not that they master-key manufacturer is incompetent...quite the contrary.
103.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Apple is not the owner of the devices, they just manufacture them.
104.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Everyone is worried about video and rightly so, or maybe is just being used as an example, but my question is: Could ISPs prevent in any way Software Updates? Could they block (for example) a patch that would fix a bug allowing them to mim
105.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
I think the downvotes most of all reflect the fact you didn't bother to read the article. The discussion is about soccer , not american football .
106.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
I picked the biggest category of apps just to show you having a watch app is irrelevant when picking an iPhone app for everything in the app store but a very narrow set of categories, and you just demonstrated that. Yes, fitness is great, m
107.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
That is all well and good, but that is not the point. The point is the App Store is bleeding watch apps every day, and Apple needs to convince developers that the watch is worth it. Even you admit that the only reason for a developer to hav
108.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
That is what in theory you think happens. What actually happens is that in very few app categories that is the case. For example, not a single game is losing market share to a competitor because they do not have a watch app.
109.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Any potential the Watch has is clearly not enough for a strong app market to develop. > Which developer wants to miss out on serving potentially millions of users? You are forgetting that most developers already have millions of potentia
110.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
It matters for Apple, for developers? not so much. Millions of users and not a single third party "killer" app.
111.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
> To give some context, in Chinese culture, asking a family member or a close friend to advise on the naming of a child is normal. In all cultures. To the downvoters: In all cultures happens and is considered normal, that doesn't me
112.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Sure, but I think about it this way: every cent you can take away from Facebook is a cent they can't spend on more spying. They left and now Facebook is gonna do it anyways and is gonna cost them 400 million less.
113.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Considering the value Apple has extracted from NeXTSTEP, they certainly underpaid for it.
114.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
They killed Nokia twice! First by forcing them to use Windows Mobile (or Windows Phone, or whatever it was called) when it was clear to all they needed to go with Android, and then by actually buying it and killing it when even Microsoft co
115.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Even more American? make it a tax deduction.
116.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
> I see the MBP as a hybrid use-case device, much like the Nintendo Switch: it throttles when freestanding (because it has nowhere to dissipate its heat to), but it runs more quickly when "docked." So you can use it for light t
117.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Everything you said is right, but you are missing the point. Thinner means more luggable, but if it restricts a workhorse machine from having more than the 16gb of ram the base model can also have because they can't fit enough battery
118.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
> Find me and put me in jail for something they cannot prove even happened? Yes. It happens more than you think.
119.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
Your attitude is inhibiting progress. Everybody knows the technology is not ready and everyone is fine with it and willing to face the consequences of refining it. Everyone except Tesla that is, which insists their self-driving tech is so a
120.
▲
by
redial
8y ago
It is as interesting as any other vague creation myth that can be made to fit with whatever you want.
More ›