redial

34 ms·

301.
by redial 10y ago
They are not irrelevant as 'hard data' , which is what you requested. If you want to have only anecdotes and personal experiences then by all means stay with what you order when you go out.
302.
by redial 10y ago
Wine bottle prices and beer prices are available everywhere. It's not that hard to compare them.
303.
by redial 10y ago
If you compare the same meal and don't account for the time you spend cooking it, it will be cheaper to do it yourself every time. If you go to fancy restaurants it's not even close. You just have to compare the price of a soda, ~
304.
by redial 10y ago
What the Mac Pro needs is commitment. Whatever shape they want to do is irrelevant if they keep it up to date and with good support.
305.
by redial 10y ago
So are reactors, in fact everything is bulletproof if you only count the successes.
306.
by redial 10y ago
Judging by the outcry for the delay, and the available units immediately selling out, that seem to be a non issue.
307.
A New History for Humanity – The Human Era(youtube.com)
2 points by redial 10y ago|0 comments
308.
by redial 10y ago
> Iris scanners are the only sure way to recognize someone For now.
309.
by redial 10y ago
> Earthquakes are caused by the ultimate God, and mediated by various other dieties or angels, > you can roughly say that a deity or angel is equivalent (in definition) to a quasiparticle. As I said, claiming understanding while showi
310.
by redial 10y ago
Then please, define god, deities and angels in an unambiguous way, using whatever language you desire, and provide a method of demonstration for all three. And since I'm rarely in the presence of someone all-knowledgeable, please provi
311.
by redial 10y ago
> The way Greeks treated their polytheism is very different from the fundamental Christian attitude towards God. That is his point, why would you choose a christian point of view instead of a greek one, besides personal preference?
312.
by redial 10y ago
My preferred terminology is the one that can be defined and backed up by repeatable demonstrations to be correctly defined. Until then, I read your sentence like this, > Earthquakes might be caused by the ultimate god, and might be m
313.
by redial 10y ago
I agree, that is why I wrote mistake in cursive. But there is a difference between blind belief, like the one described on op's comment and, as you put it, scientific belief. Ignoring that difference is the mistake.
314.
by redial 10y ago
The difference is this; when you go back to re define 1, you don't change the nature or meaning of the number 1, it still fits everywhere it did before, in all cases operates like it did before, all the changes happened in you, in you
315.
by redial 10y ago
If everything can mean anything, then yes, they are all equal. And no one is discounting Aristotle, I don't know where you are getting that idea.
316.
by redial 10y ago
The mistake is believing. What is believed is irrelevant. Science should not be taken at face value any more than religion should. If you accept science just because you are told to believe in it, then it's not science.
317.
by redial 10y ago
Was that supposed to answer op's question?
318.
by redial 10y ago
> Don't discount them until you know why they were believed. It seems you already discounted most of them and chose the one most comfortable to you.
319.
by redial 10y ago
> I also have a Macbook and its the perfect computer for normal laptop tasks. I am surprised by how many people don't know this exists. They know it exists, they also know is $1300 and up.
320.
by redial 10y ago
He was never the CEO of Apple. He was Head of Macintosh Development.
321.
by redial 10y ago
In the episode The Science of Humans at War [1] of the StarTalk podcast, around the 25 min mark, they ask the question of human modification, specially for the harsh environments of space, and claim that in almost every case it has been tr
322.
by redial 10y ago
Sure, communism might be a bad idea, but why is it so unforgivable ? specially when is not your country? And it's not like nobody got locked up in the 50s without a hint of a trial just for the suspicion of being 'communist'
323.
by redial 10y ago
Every time I read a comment like that, I remember that history is written by the winners.
324.
by redial 10y ago
But the question is when would they donate their organs? (Making the assumption that most organ donations come from people in car accidents).
325.
by redial 10y ago
To my knowledge they don't judge in line with the public interest , but with the law, and shouting fire is not against the law.
326.
by redial 10y ago
Who is to judge what is or isn't in the public interest? Is a song that shouts fire illegal? not protected? The fire argument always gets made, but is shouting fire actually illegal or even regulated?
327.
by redial 10y ago
If they control the checksum check they can alter it too. Maybe, if you are careful enough to store all the checksums of everything you do online you will be able to tell, but others that see your posts won't even notice.
328.
by redial 10y ago
> Best to just profess absolute ignorance IMO. That, and call bullshit when someone tries to convince you of a position shielded by meaningless phrases, obfuscated by scientific words, that just happen to fit exactly in the hole left by
329.
by redial 10y ago
This is the way the world (of Apple) ends, not with a bang but with a whimper. One for each unit that turns off the lights...
330.
by redial 10y ago
> Device data is encrypted with a user’s passcode I think it uses the passcode you set on your phone, not the password of your iCloud account.

More ›